Kent is a member of the Utility & Energy practice as well as the Business Litigation practice with a focus on Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Franchising, Business Torts and Corporate Law at Stoll Keenon Ogden. His corporate practice involves counseling on a wide variety of corporate transactions, including financing, mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, private equity transactions, corporate valuations and shareholder disputes. He has extensive experience negotiating utility service agreements, procurement contracts for large industrial manufacturing companies, and electric generating plant agreements. Kent is Corporate Secretary to a large manufacturing joint venture and serves as principal outside counsel to a number of businesses, having guided many businesses through organization and start-up into periods of growth and maturity.
As a trial attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Kent gained extensive experience investigating and prosecuting antitrust cases in regulated industries. A frequent theme of his practice is the interplay between law and economics in the energy, telecommunications, utility, aluminum and construction industries. He appears before federal and state courts and agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Kentucky Public Service Commission, in matters involving economic and utility regulation and rates. He has successfully handled numerous Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act cases and has unique experience in corporate and governance issues for joint ventures. Kent completed specialized litigation training at the National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
Kent is AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated™ by Martindale-Hubbell® and has been listed for many years in Best Lawyers in America® (Administrative Law, Communications Law and Energy Law), in “Chambers USA” (Environment, Natural Resources and Regulated Industries) and is recognized as a Kentucky Super Lawyer (Utilities).
He is a member of the Kentucky, Louisville and American Bar associations, as well as the Energy Bar Association and the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation.
Recognition
• AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated™ by Martindale-Hubbell®
• Best Lawyers®, Lawyer of the Year, 2013
• Best Lawyers®, Administrative / Regulatory Law, Business Organizations (including LLCs and Partnerships), Communications Law, and Energy Law, 1991-present
• Kentucky Super Lawyers® Honoree, 2007-2011; 2015-2019
• Louisville Magazine Top Lawyer, Administrative Law, Antitrust Law, Corporate Law, 2012-2014; Administrative Law and Antitrust & Trade Regulation Law, 2016
• Chambers USA, Leading Lawyer for Business, Utilities, 2015-2017
• Order of the Coif
Work Highlights
Antitrust, Corporate Governance and Major Contract Counseling
Serve as antitrust counsel and corporate secretary to major manufacturing joint venture of two competing companies. Involves antitrust compliance, governance matters, and negotiation and drafting of major contracts for construction and general procurement.
Related Practices: Business Services, Antitrust, Trade Regulation & Franchise
Utility Contracting and Joint Ventures
Represent utilities and large purchasers of electric power and natural gas in negotiation of contract for purchase and sale of energy and energy services. Includes traditional utility tariff relationships, as well as special contracts for solar renewable energy. Negotiation of significant electric generation joint venture agreements.
Related Practices: Utility & Energy
Franchising
Represent independent franchisees in financing, franchisor relationships, contracting, construction, leasing and related matters.
Related Practices: Construction Law
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Cases
Successfully handled major litigated rate case before FERC on behalf of utility purchaser of wholesale distribution service. Case established new ratemaking methodology through extensive hearing and resulted in substantial refunds and lower purchase rates for SKO client.
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and Ameren Illinois Company, 148 FERC ¶ 61,206, Opinion 534 (2014)
Related Practices: Utility & Energy
Equity Offerings and Corporate Governance
Currently represent a software services company that provides a suite of management and IT solutions for financial institutions, designed to improve efficiency and compliance with federal regulations in connection with seed round and subsequent financings involving a large private equity funds.
Related Practices: Emerging Business And Venture Capital, Corporate Finance & Lending, Securities & Corporate Governance
Recapitalization and Restructuring of Financial Services Compliance Firm
Represented financial services compliance firm in all aspects of recapitalization and sale of multiple series of securities to private equity firm and other stockholders.
Related Practices: Business Services
Sale of Financial Services Technology Business to Private Equity Firm
Represented sellers in negotiating and closing the sale of major high technology, financial services business. Included confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, review of competing proposals by prospective purchasers; due diligence; negotiation and closing of all purchase agreements with well-known private equity firm buyer.
Related Practices: Business Services
Class Action, Telecommunications, Public Utility, Taxation & Consumer Protection
SKO represented a class of more than 450,000 members in U.S. District Court challenge to overcharges/tariff violations by regulated telecommunications carrier. SKO obtained summary judgment on federal overcharge claims for class members and protected class certification by defeating an interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. SKO also prevailed for class members in a collateral state utility commission proceeding on issues referred by the District Court. Settlement approved by District Court in November 2013 included cash refunds to all class members. Bowers v. Windstream Ky. East, LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157242 (W.D. Ky. 2013).
Related Practices: Utility & Energy, Class Action, Business Litigation
Antitrust, Robinson-Patman Act
Successfully defended manufacturer of lawn and garden equipment against Robinson-Patman Act claims in distribution before Sixth Circuit and District Court. New Albany Tractor, Inc. v. Louisville Tractor, Inc., 650 F. 3d 1046 (2011); New Albany Tractor, Inc., v. Louisville Tractor, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 352, (U.S.D.C. W.D. Ky. 2010).
Related Practices: Antitrust, Trade Regulation & Franchise
Federal and State Regulation, Telecommunications
Obtained favorable ruling in interconnection dispute between major telecommunication carriers, prevailing before Sixth Circuit, District Court, and Kentucky Public Service Commission. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc. v. Goss, 142 Fed. Appx. 886 (6th Cir. 2005).
Related Practices: Utility & Energy
Antitrust, Telecommunications
Successfully defended telecommunications carrier in Sixth Circuit and District Court against antitrust and related claims in suit brought by prison inmates. Daleure v. Kentucky, 269 F. 3d 540 (6th Cir. 2001); Daleure v. Kentucky, 119 F. Supp. 2d 683 (U.S.D.C W.D. Ky. 2000).
Related Practices: Utility & Energy
Antitrust, Constitutionality of State Law
Kendrick brought action on behalf of a major grocery chain claiming Sherman Act and Kentucky Constitution violations by a state agency in Kentucky Milk Mktng. & Antimonopoly Comm’n. v. Kroger Co., 691 S.W.2d 893 (Ky. 1985). The result invalidated state statutes regulating milk marketing.
Related Practices: Antitrust, Trade Regulation & Franchise
Injunctive Relief, State Insurance Regulation
Obtained injunctive relief for major retailer of vision care products against major insurer of vision care for violation of state “any willing provider” law. Dr. Mark Lynn & Assocs., PLLC v. Vision Service Plan Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24820 (U.S.D.C. W.D. Ky. 2005).
Related Practices: Business Litigation, Antitrust, Trade Regulation & Franchise
Sale of Natural Gas Production Interests
Represented sellers of significant natural gas production interests in series of large transactions with strategic buyers. Included negotiation with multiple prospective purchasers, NDAs, due diligence, regulatory issues, negotiation and closing of all purchase-related agreements.
Related Practices: Business Services, Utility & Energy
Competing Venture by an LLC Member
When a minority member of an LLC organized a competing venture, SKO brought suit and obtained injunctive relief on behalf of our client based upon minority member’s breach of his statutory duty of loyalty. After a two-week jury trial, obtained favorable settlement for client.
Related Practices: Business Owner Disputes, Business Litigation
LLC Member’s “Salary”
When a terminated member argued that he was still entitled to his “salary,” SKO prevailed in the lawsuit, demonstrating that the “salary” was a distribution and that under state law the LLC was prohibited from making a distribution under existing circumstances.
Related Practices: Business Owner Disputes, Business Litigation
News
118 SKO Attorneys Named to “2023 U.S. News Best Lawyers® in America”, Aug. 18, 2022
77 STOLL KEENON OGDEN ATTORNEYS HONORED IN “BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA” 2022 Edition, Aug. 19, 2021
SKO Attorneys Recognized Among 2020 Best Lawyers in America®, Aug. 15, 2019
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 52 Stoll Keenon Ogden Attorneys, Dec. 11, 2018
SKO Attorneys Recognized Among 2019 Best Lawyers in America, Aug. 15, 2018
SKO Attorneys Recognized Among Best Lawyers in America, Aug. 16, 2017
Five SKO Attorneys Recognized Among Top 50 Kentucky Super Lawyers, Nov. 18, 2016
Best Lawyers in America Chooses 61 SKO Attorneys for 2017 Publication, Aug. 30, 2016
30 SKO Attorneys Named “Top Lawyer” by Louisville Magazine, Mar. 2, 2016
Lea Pauley Goff and Richard G. Griffith named among Top 50 Kentucky Super Lawyers, Nov. 30, 2015
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2016, Aug. 17, 2015
28 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2015, Apr. 1, 2015
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 57 Stoll Keenon Ogden Attorneys, Nov. 24, 2014
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2015, Aug. 18, 2014
33 SKO Attorneys Named “Top Lawyer” by Louisville Magazine, Mar. 25, 2014
25 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2014, Mar. 12, 2014
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2014, Aug. 19, 2013
22 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2013, June 5, 2013
34 SKO Attorneys Names “Top Lawyer” by Louisville Magazine, Mar. 5, 2013
22 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2013, Feb. 10, 2013
SKO Attorneys Named “Lawyer Of The Year” by Best Lawyers, Sep. 19, 2012
61 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2013, Sep. 7, 2012
22 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2012, June 7, 2012
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2012, Feb. 28, 2012
53 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2012, Sep. 6, 2011
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 25 SKO Attorneys, July 25, 2011
SKO Named Kentucky Antitrust Firm of the Year, Jan. 31, 2011
53 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® 2011, Aug. 6, 2010
26 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Kentucky Super Lawyers, July 28, 2010
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA, June 14, 2010
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2010, Apr. 15, 2010
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 27 SKO Attorneys, Aug. 15, 2009
49 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Aug. 6, 2009
SKO Attorneys Recognized by Chambers USA 2009, June 15, 2009
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 26 SKO Attorneys, July 29, 2008
Lawyers Honored by Chambers USA, June 19, 2008
39 SKO Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Sep. 19, 2007
Kentucky Super Lawyers Recognizes 24 SKO Attorneys, June 19, 2007
Louisville Magazine Recognizes SKO Attorneys as Best Lawyers in America, Mar. 15, 2006
Affiliations
• Kentucky Bar Association
• Louisville Bar Association
• American Bar Association
• Energy Bar Association
• Energy & Mineral Law Foundation
• Christian Alliance for Orphans, Founding Director
• Bob Russell Ministries, Inc, Founding Director
• Logan Aluminum Inc., Corporate Secretary
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
