Daniel J. Pingelton

Daniel J. Pingelton: Attorney with The Pingelton Law Firm
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Dan Pingelton is an attorney in private practice in Columbia, Missouri, concentrating on civil litigation and family law. He graduated from Arizona State University in 1981 with a degree in Journalism, and received his law degree from the University of Colorado in 1984. From 1986 to 1998, he was a contract and staff attorney for the Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement. Mr. Pingelton wrote the first state-level administrative hearing decision for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to be published in the national Education of the Handicapped Law Reporter (now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Law Reporter). He served for 18 years as a hearing officer pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Some of Dan’s reported cases include Dye v. Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement, 811 S.W.2d 355 (Mo. banc 1981) [constitutionality of administrative child support enforcement statutes]; Baird v. Baird, 843 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.E.D. 1992) [first Missouri case confirming use of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to seize ERISA retirement funds for child support and maintenance arrears]; McCreary v. McCreary, 954 S.W.2d 433 (Mo.App.W.D. 1997) [multiple issues including proper standard for modification of custody; proper use of remedy of equitable accounting in a fiduciary relationship for child support; mandatory award of attorney fees; and liability for medical expense reimbursement]; and M.D. v. J.J., 30 S.W.3d 215 (Mo.App.W.D. 2000) [established Missouri precedent that an unmarried person can recover damages for negligent transmission of the herpes virus].

Dan has presented continuing legal education seminars for The Missouri Bar as well as child support professionals both in Missouri and throughout the country, including national IV-D law reviews for the NCSEA in 2002 (New Orleans), 2003 (Orlando) and 2004 (Palm Springs). He has also spoken at various conferences for WICSEC and ERICSA, and has presented every year at the MCSEA conferences since 1998. He wrote two chapters for Missouri Family Law, 7th ed., published by the Missouri Bar: Marital Settlement and Separation Agreements and The Family Support Division. He recently completed the second edition of Missouri IV-D Law (2012). He has authored several articles including Administrative and Judicial Processes in Child Support Cases, GPSolo (American Bar Association, July/August 2015). He is a Past President and Honorary Life Member of the Missouri Child Support Enforcement Association.

Areas of Practice (16)

  • Criminal Law
  • School Law
  • Child Custody
  • Divorce
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Personal Injury
  • Accidents
  • Automobile Accidents
  • Automobile Negligence
  • Bodily Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Plaintiffs Personal Injury
  • Truck Accidents
  • DUI/DWI
  • Felonies

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Arizona State University, B.S., 1981
Law School Attended:
University of Colorado at Boulder School of Law, J.D., 1984 Law Review; University of Colorado at Boulder School of Law, J.D., Rothgerber Moot Court Competition
Year of First Admission:
1985
Admission:
1985, Missouri; 1985, U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri; 1988, U.S. Supreme Court
Memberships:
The Missouri Bar; American Bar Association
Special Agencies:
Missouri Family Support Division; Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education; Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission;
Birth Information:
Kansas City, Missouri, February 9, 1959
Reported Cases:
Dye v. Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement, 811 S.W.2d 355 (Mo. banc 1981) [constitutionality of administrative child support enforcement statutes]

Baird v. Baird, 843 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.E.D. 1992) [first Missouri case confirming use of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to seize ERISA retirement funds for child support and maintenance arrears]

McCreary v. McCreary, 954 S.W.2d 433 (Mo.App.W.D. 1997) [multiple issues including proper standard for modification of custody; proper use of remedy of equitable accounting in a fiduciary relationship for child support; mandatory award of attorney fees; and liability for medical expense reimbursement];

M.D. v. J.J., 30 S.W.3d 215 (Mo.App.W.D. 2000) [established Missouri precedent that an unmarried person can recover damages for negligent transmission of the herpes virus]

ISLN:
904415726
Hobbies & interests:
Dan Pingelton teaches TaeKwon Do through Columbia Parks and Recreation.

Payment Information

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Visa

Peer Reviews

3.1/5.0 (5 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® Notable Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    3.2/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    3.1/5.0
  • Judgment

    3.0/5.0
  • Communication

    3.0/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    3.2/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
2.3/5.0 (3 reviews)
Lawyers Client Review
1.9/5.0 (6 reviews)
 Client Champion

I don't know what I would have done without the Pingleton Law Firm going through my lengthy child custody/support case. {newline}As sensitive as a custody cases are, Dan and his Assistant Kristy make...

See more

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Daniel J. Pingelton

Contact Information:
573-968-0255  Phone
573-442-6109  Fax
www.pinglaw.com
www.pinglaw.com/dan-pingelton.html

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.