Darren Nicholson

Open for Business
Darren Nicholson: Attorney with Burns Charest LLP
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

An accomplished trial lawyer, Darren Nicholson has been trying cases in state and federal courts for more than twenty years. After beginning his career at Arnold & Porter LLP in Washington D.C., one of the country’s premier law firms, he returned to Dallas in 2008 and became a partner at the nationally-recognized trial boutique Sayles Werbner PC. Darren joined Burns Charest LLP in 2019 with one goal in mind – to help build one of the premier trial firms in the country.

Darren’s cases have been covered by The Dallas Morning News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Bloomberg News, and other publications. Currently, he is lead counsel for Parkland and other hospitals who have filed claims against manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who caused the opioid epidemic. His past cases include successfully representing plaintiffs in a multi-million dollar lawsuit involving business fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and commercial bribery; obtaining a multi-million dollar jury verdict against Forgent Network for breach of a patent licensing agreement; and obtaining a favorable judgment in the Texas Ranger Baseball Partners bankruptcy for breach of contract, among many others.

Just as every case is different, so is every client. Whatever the case, Darren invests the time and effort to identify the client’s objectives and to tailor an aggressive strategy to achieve them – whether trying a case, negotiating a settlement, avoiding litigation, or pursuing another option entirely.

Honors

Best Lawyers in America, 2018-2024

Best Lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine, 2017-2023

Texas Super Lawyers, 2017-2023

Texas Super Lawyers Rising Stars, 2010-2015

Fellow, Texas Bar Foundation

Barrister, Patrick E. Higginbotham Inn of Court, 2009-2012

Named “Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyer” by Lawdragon (2022-2023)

Named “Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyer” by Lawdragon (2022-2024)

Engagements

The Ethics of Witness Preparation and Presentation, State Bar of Texas, Sept. 2019

Turning the Tables—Offers of Judgment Under Federal Rule 68, Dallas Bar Association, Sept. 2015

Protecting Plaintiffs’ Wins from the IRS, Texas Lawyer, June 2014

Closing Arguments, Dallas Bar Association Trial Academy, Oct. 2012

Exclude the Opposing Expert Witness on Qualifications and Reliability, Dallas Bar Association, July 2010

The Ethics of Lawyer-Judge Interactions, presented to the Higginbotham Inn of Court, March 2010

Financial Institutions Fraud, 37 American Criminal Law Review 551, Spring 2000

Representative Cases

Mass Tort, Wrongful Death, Products Liability Cases:

• Dallas County Hospital District, d/b/a Parkland Health & Hospital System, et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, et al. – currently representing hospitals against the manufacturers, distributors, and retailers that caused the opioid epidemic.

• Powell, et al. v. Thornton Drilling, et al. – confidential settlement on the eve of trial for two minor children in a wrongful death case involving a West Texas oil rig.

• Artinger, et al. v. i3 Plastic Cards, et al. – substantial confidential settlement for a widow and minor child in a wrongful death case involving a workplace electrocution.

• In re Diet Drugs (Phentermine, Fenfluramine, Dexfenfluramine) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. MDL 1203 –representation of Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company in hundreds of product liability cases.

Complex Business Cases:

• AerReach, et al., v. Stanford, et al. – represented plaintiffs in a multi-million dollar business fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and commercial bribery case against multiple defendants.

• Paradigm Air v. Texas Rangers Baseball Partners – summary judgment recovery for client in breach-of-contract case stemming from the Texas Rangers Baseball Partners’ bankruptcy.

• Andrew Silver v. Tabletop Media, LLC d/b/a Ziosk – favorable settlement for defendant and counter-plaintiff in a breach of contract case involving a patent purchase agreement.

• A take-nothing judgment and an order sealing the case for a client wrongfully accused of fraud and tortious interference of a contract.

False Claims Act Cases:

• United States of America, ex rel. Haight v. RRSA (Commercial Division) LLC, et al. – currently representing relator in a False Claims Act case involving fraudulent small business subcontracting on military bases

• United States of America, ex rel. Haight Fisher, et al. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing – settlement of a major False Claims Act case against non-bank mortgage servicer where plaintiffs sought over $100 million in damages.

Intellectual Property Cases:

• Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.,135 S.Ct. 1920 (2015) – favorable U.S. Supreme Court ruling eliminating the defense of good-faith belief in invalidity to induced infringement claims.

• e-Lynxx Corporation v. Ariba – obtained significant patent licensing agreements in patent infringement lawsuit and development of licensing program.

Criminal Cases:

• U.S. v. Mahoney – acquittal on a seven-count indictment for a court-appointed client in Washington, D.C. Superior Court.

• U.S. v. Barry, et al. – favorable plea bargain and no jail time for a real estate agent indicted in a federal case involving mortgage fraud.

Areas of Practice (8)

  • Litigation
  • Civil Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Commercial
  • Personal Injury
  • Litigation: Commercial
  • Litigation: Personal Injury
  • Derivatives

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Texas at Austin, B.S., Mathematics, 1997; University of Texas at Austin, B.A., Psychology, 1997
Law School Attended:
Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., with honors, 2001
Year of First Admission:
2001
Admission:
2001, Texas; 2002, District of Columbia; 2021, West Virginia; U.S. Supreme Court
Birth Information:
Dallas, Texas, March 22, 1975
ISLN:
916713353

Peer Reviews

4.9/5.0 (13 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.9/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.9/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.8/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 06/05/18 in Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 04/06/15 in Civil Litigation

    Darren is a top notch lawyer. I've seen him get results that far exceeded my expectation.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 04/02/15 in Civil Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Member on 03/30/15 in Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Member on 03/30/15 in Civil Litigation

    Fully deserving of your highest rating

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 03/29/15 in Civil Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 03/29/15 in Products Liability

    It has been many years since I have worked with Darren, but we worked very closely together for several years when he was a younger lawyer, and he was one of the better associates with whom I worked. He is exceptionally smart and has excellent judgm... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 03/23/15 in Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Associate on 03/23/15 in Civil Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Member on 03/23/15 in Business Litigation

    Darren is an excellent attorney and meets the high standards for competence and ethics.

Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Darren Nicholson

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.