Ms. Davida S. Perry

Open for Business
Ms. Davida S. Perry: Attorney with Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Davida S. Perry has been a civil litigator since 1986 and holds the distinction of an "AV" rating with Preeminence from Martindale-Hubbell. Ms. Perry was selected and honored as a Super Lawyer in 2009. In 1994, Ms. Perry and her father, Murray Schwartz, created the partnership of Schwartz Perry & Heller. Since the firm's inception, Ms. Perry has devoted her efforts almost exclusively toward representing victims of unlawful employment discrimination, including age, disability, gender, race, sexual orientation and pregnancy discrimination as well as sexual harassment.   Ms. Perry worked alongside her father in the landmark sexual harassment case of Thoreson v. Penthouse Magazine and Robert Guccione. In Thoreson, the finding of sexual harassment was sustained on appeal by both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals, which set a significant precedent that a claim of sexual harassment can be established based on the victim's testimony alone. Ms. Perry assisted in the briefing and argument of both appeals.   In 1991, the City of New York enacted its own Human Rights Law authorizing a private cause of judicial action for victims of employment discrimination. The New York City law was challenged in Bracker v. Cohen, a sexual harassment case in which Schwartz Perry & Heller represented the plaintiff. Ms. Perry was significantly involved in responding to the challenge to the law, which was ultimately found to be constitutional. As a result, a multitude of cases have been instituted under that law.   Notably, Ms. Perry served as Second Chair during the trial of McIntyre v. Manhattan Ford, a sexual harassment, retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress suit. A Manhattan jury awarded the plaintiff $6.6 million, which, even after being reduced by the trial court and then by the appellate court, still stands as one of the highest awards for sexual harassment in the entire nation. The case, after trial, continued through the appellate process and was concluded, with the judgment paid, in 1999. Ms. Perry participated in all aspects of the appeal. The plaintiff in McIntyre, as well as Ms. Perry and her father, were celebrated at a ceremony for Courageous Plaintiffs conducted by the New York chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association.   In June 2006, following a two-week trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the jury returned a verdict in favor of a client of Schwartz Perry & Heller in the amount of $2.5 million, of which $300,000 was an award for punitive damages. The verdict was based upon a retaliation claim arising from the plaintiff's allegation of age discrimination. Since the action was brought under the New York City Law and was removed to Federal court, the amount was not subject to the Federal cap. After adding damages and interest, the amount of the final judgment paid totaled nearly $4 million. Ms. Perry had an active role throughout the case.   Ms. Perry has co-authored numerous articles and publications for programs sponsored by the New York State Bar Association, the National Employment Lawyers Association and the Practising Law Institute.   More than 10 years ago, the firm developed a Summer legal internship program at the request of a New York law school. The initial programs were so successful that the firm initiated on-going legal internship programs throughout the academic year as well. In 2008, Schwartz Perry & Heller was joined by 24 students from nine law schools in the New York and New Jersey areas. Ms. Perry takes an active role in mentoring future lawyers through the firm’s legal internship program.

Areas of Practice (23)

  • Employment Discrimination
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Race Discrimination
  • Pregnancy Discrimination
  • National Origin Discrimination
  • Religious Discrimination
  • Sexual Orientation Discrimination
  • Labor and Employment
  • Age Discrimination in Employment
  • Employment Arbitration
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Law
  • Employment Litigation
  • Employment Mediation
  • Harassment
  • Agreements
  • Reductions in Force
  • Retaliatory Discharge
  • Title VII Discrimination
  • Sex or Gender Discrimination
  • Hostile Work Environment
  • Employment Disability Discrimination

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Skidmore College, B.A., highest honors, 1982
Law School Attended:
New England School of Law, J.D., cum laude, 1985
Year of First Admission:
1986
Admission:
1986, New York; 1986, Massachusetts; 1992, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York; 1992, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; 1996, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; 1999, U.S. Supreme Court; 2002, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Memberships:
New York State Bar Association, 1999—; National Association of Women Lawyers, 2009.
ISLN:
900248427

Payment Information

Other Information
Free initial consultation

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
5.0/5.0 (5 reviews)

Avvo Peer Endorsements

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Ms. Davida S. Perry

Contact Information

Preferred contact method
reCAPTCHA is required Invalid reCAPTCHA

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.