G. Martin Meyers, Esq.

Open for Business
G. Martin Meyers, Esq.: Attorney with Law Offices of G. Martin Meyers, P.C.
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

G. Martin Meyers, Esq. is a graduate of the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce of the University of Pennsylvania, where he maintained a Dean’s List average and earned the degree of Bachelor of Science in Economics in May 1968. Mr. Meyers received his law degree (Juris Doctor) from New York University School of Law in May 1971 and was admitted to the New Jersey bar in November 1971.

Mr. Meyers has concentrated his practice primarily in the area of complex civil litigation. He has maintained his own practice since November 1972, for the most part representing individuals who have been injured, defrauded, or victimized in some other manner in connection with their individual legal rights.

Mr. Meyers has been designated a Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, has been recognized by Avvo, and he is a recipient of the AV Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell, its highest rating. In addition, in 1997 Mr. Meyers obtained the largest jury verdict in a Products Liability case in New Jersey, a verdict in the amount of $9.9 million in the case of Molinaro v. Harley-Davidson Inc. The case was later settled on a confidential basis.

Areas of Practice (11)

  • Complex Civil Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Securities Litigation
  • Fraud
  • Class Actions
  • Mass Tort Litigation
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Civil
  • Employment & Labor
  • Wrongful Death

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania, B.S.E., 1968
Law School Attended:
New York University, J.D., 1971
Year of First Admission:
1971
Admission:
1971, New Jersey
Memberships:
The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; New Jersey Trial Lawyers Association; National Association of Securities Fraud and Commercial Attorneys.
Birth Information:
New York, N.Y., May 8, 1946
Reported Cases:

Wilde v. O’Leary, 374 N.J. Super. 582 (App. Div. 2005); Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corp., 223 F. 3d 190 (3d Cir. 2000); Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corp., 32F. Supp. 2d (D.N.J. 1998); Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corporation, 164 F.R.D. 391 D.N.J. 1996; Theodore v. Dover Board of Education, 444 A.2d 60 (App. Div. 1982); United States Nuclear Energy Regulatory Commission v. Radiation Technology, Inc., 519 F. Supp. 1266 (D.N.J. 1981); Zwirn v. County of Hudson, 347 A.2d 822 (Law Div. 1975).

Kahanovitz v. Electro-Biology, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-5417-11T4, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1917, April 30, 2013.

Kahanovitz v. Electro-Biology, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-3635-09T3, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION, 2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 190, October 19, 2010.
Certifications:
Certified Civil Trial Attorney, Supreme Court of New Jersey, Board on Trial Attorney Certification
ISLN:
904826263

Payment Information

Fixed Hourly Rates
Available
Other Information
Free initial consultation

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)

Avvo Peer Endorsements

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact G. Martin Meyers, Esq.

Contact Information:

862-458-0594  Phone

gmeyerslaw.com/g-martin-meyers

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.