Jay Holland

Open for Business
Jay Holland: Attorney with Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A.
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Proudly displayed in Jay Holland’s office is a plaque that reads: “The Best Lawyer a Client Could Ever Have.” Jay, who was recently honored as a Benchmark Litigation Star, is also recognized by Best Lawyers in America®, Chambers USA, Super Lawyers® and others. The customized award was a gift from a client at the end of a seven-and-a-half–year legal battle. The success wasn’t just winning the case in court; it was also serving as a loyal ally, protector, and advocate for the client throughout his long journey to achieve justice.

A principal in Joseph, Greenwald & Laake’s Civil Litigation Group and chair of the firm’s Labor, Employment, and Qui Tam Whistleblower practice, Jay Holland is a renowned employment and qui tam litigator known for taking on tough cases and achieving exceptional results. Jay counsels clients in individual and class action cases involving gender and race discrimination and sexual harassment, violations of the wage and hour laws, and wrongful termination. Jay has an active qui tam practice, representing whistleblowers in actions under the federal False Claims Act.

Jay has been lead counsel in several high-profile cases that have received national media attention. In Clark v. Prince George’s County, he represented a group of 64 highly qualified firefighters whose employment offers had been rescinded based on the county’s illegal affirmative action policy. Jay obtained the extraordinary relief of an affirmative injunction requiring the county to hire the firefighters. Jay also successfully blocked the Maryland Board of Elections’ attempts to oust Elections Administrator Linda Lamone for political reasons.

Jay has achieved extraordinary success in several high-profile qui tam cases under the False Claims Act, resulting in settlements of hundreds of millions of dollars. For example, Jay represented the relator in the case of United States ex. rel Hallivis v. Allergan. In that matter, Jay pursued a whistleblower case against Allergan, the maker of Botox®, for off-label marketing of Botox for pharmaceutical purposes. Allergan ultimately pled guilty to criminal charges and settled the case for a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fines. Jay also successfully pursued a case of off-label marketing and misrepresentation against the spinal device maker Trans1, which resulted in a total settlement of $6 million. He also prosecuted and resolved qui tam and retaliation matters for millions of dollars on behalf of his clients in cases involving over-billing on Defense Department contracts and failing to pay government-required wages to employees on multiple government contracts.

Jay has obtained favorable results for government and private-sector employees in severe sexual harassment and retaliation cases, resulting in millions of dollars in settlements and other relief for his clients, including job transfers, reinstatement of leave, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees.

Jay is known for providing superior service to all his clients. One client said of him, “Thank you for taking the time to explain the law, strategy and our case. You have a natural ability to explain things in a very methodical and informative way. Kudos on that talent!”

Jay is a frequent lecturer and writer on labor, employment law, and False Claims Act cases and is often called upon to present to bar associations and other organizations. He also is frequently quoted in the media on employment and qui tam cases. He co-chairs the Employment Law Section of the Prince George’s County Bar Association and is active in the Employment Law sections of the Maryland State Bar Association and American Bar Association.

Areas of Practice (13)

  • Whistleblower (False Claims Act, Qui Tam)
  • Labor & Employment
  • Civil Rights
  • Civil Litigation
  • Appellate
  • Administrative Litigation
  • Arbitration and Mediation
  • Commercial and Business Litigation
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Public Regulation
  • Job Discrimination
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Massachusetts, B.A., 1984
Law School Attended:
Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law, J.D., 1988
Year of First Admission:
1988
Admission:
1988, Maryland; 1989, District of Columbia; U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland; U.S. Supreme Court
Memberships:
Federal Bar Association; American Bar Association; Maryland State Bar Association; Prince George’s County Bar Association; Montgomery County Bar Association; District of Columbia Bar Association; District of Columbia Bar Association; National Employment Lawyers Association; Maryland Employment Lawyers Association; Maryland Trial Lawyers Association; Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association; Federal Bar Association; Qui Tam Bar Association.
ISLN:
906416967

Peer Reviews

4.7/5.0 (6 reviews)
Peer Reviewed
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.7/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.7/5.0
  • Communication

    4.7/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.8/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Lawyers Client Review
3.8/5.0 (1 review)
 Client Champion

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Jay Holland

Contact Information:

240-843-1076  Phone

301-220-1214  Fax

www.jgllaw.com/attorney/jay-holland

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.