Jodi Westbrook Flowers

Open for Business
Jodi Westbrook Flowers: Attorney with Motley Rice LLC
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

A veteran of the courtroom, Jodi Westbrook Flowers seeks to protect the health, safety and rights of consumers, families, investors, workers, and victims of crime and terrorism. Jodi has litigated a wide range of cases involving tobacco, asbestos, lead pigment, aviation disasters, consumer fraud, cybersecurity and product defects, as well as terrorist financing and human rights violations.

Jodi also represents public entities seeking to hold opioid manufacturers and distributors accountable for allegedly deceptive marketing and distribution practices that contributed to the nation’s opioid crisis.

In the vehicle defect multidistrict litigation, In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, Jodi works on cases related to economic loss due to faulty ignition switches installed in more than 14 million recalled GM vehicles. Previously, she worked to demonstrate the necessary minimum contacts within the U.S. for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Bridgestone Corporation in the class action for damages allegedly caused by vehicle and tire defects, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., ATX, ATX II and Wilderness Tire Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 00-MDL-1373-SEB (S.D.Ind.). She also led a team at Motley Rice in the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Fraud class action litigation, working on behalf of defrauded consumers in the $15 billion settlement deal for 2.0-liter vehicles. The settlement was the largest auto-related consumer class action in U.S. history, and among the fastest reached of its kind. Jodi represents clients who have raised similar allegations against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, claiming the automaker installed emissions cheating software in thousands of 3.0-liter diesel vehicles, in In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales Practice and Products Liability Litigation.

Jodi serves as co-liaison counsel and represents victims in the 21st Century Oncology data breach multidistrict litigation. She also represents consumers and businesses impacted by security flaws believed to affect virtually all Intel Corp., computer processors.

Jodi handles a variety of cases regarding the state-sponsorship of international terrorism, as well as human rights litigation involving violations of international law and human rights abuses. Jodi now leads the legal team founded by Ron Motley that brought the groundbreaking litigation against the financiers and material supporters of al Qaeda. Representing thousands of family members and survivors of Sept. 11, 2001, in a pioneering civil action to hold al Qaeda’s sponsors accountable and cut off the terror support pipeline, she serves on the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee for the In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 litigation consolidated by the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. She aided 9/11 victims and families in their years-long push to pass the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which became law in 2016.

Jodi is currently involved in processing claims for the new Victims’ Compensation Fund for first responders, area residents, and anyone whose health may have been affected by exposure to environmental toxins released in the terrorist attacks. She was also an integral member of the Motley Rice aviation security litigation team seeking accountability and change in aviation security following the 9/11 attacks. In addition, Jodi also represents international terror victims who have filed claims through the U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund.

Jodi also played a key role in Linde et al. v. Arab Bank PLC, filed by victims of terrorist bombings in Israel against Arab Bank for allegedly financing Hamas and other Israeli terrorist organizations. This case marked the first time that a financial institution has been brought to trial under the Anti-Terrorism Act. Jodi also helped lead a parallel suit for thousands of non-U.S. citizens, Jesner v. Arab Bank, which was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding violations of customary international law by foreign corporations under the Alien Tort Statute.

She served as the lead negotiator in the last hold-out of the individual cases against Libya for the Lockerbie bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, and continues to seek justice for victims of Libyan sponsored terrorism during Qadhafi’s reign. Jodi also authored an amicus brief, supporting section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, regarding the trade regulation of conflict minerals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. She was also an integral member of a team that sought recourse for young victims of human trafficking and child enslavement for use as camel jockeys, and filed a federal civil complaint against several leaders in the United Arab Emirates for their alleged role.

Jodi has worked on environmental contamination cases in the Virgin Islands involving leaking gas tanks, and she represented clients in advancing their Deepwater Horizon oil spill claims through the programs established by the two settlements reached with BP. Jodi has served on numerous MDL Executive Committees and subcommittees, and holds several leadership positions within the firm.

Jodi began her career applying restitution and fraud theories to the litigation against the tobacco industry which resulted in the historic Master Settlement Agreement between the state attorneys general and the tobacco industry. She developed expert and whistleblower testimony and synthesized millions of pages of documents for trial. She prepared the false-marketing and child targeting case against the tobacco industry which resulted in restrictions on cartoon ads and the retirement of Joe Camel.

Jodi has been interviewed by various media outlets, including U.S. and foreign television, radio and print media. She provides pro bono work on a variety of global, national and community issues and helped establish the firm’s Charitable Contributions Committee. She served as a member of the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights Advisory Council from 2014 to 2016, and currently serves on the board of the PanAm 103 Lockerbie Legacy Foundation, and as a member of the South Carolina Human Trafficking Task Force.

Published Works:

“Remarks on the GJIL Symposium on Corporate Responsibility and the Alien Tort Statute,” Georgetown Journal of International Law, Volume 43-Issue 4, Summer 2012. (43 Geo. J. Int’l. L. 1601)

* Please remember that every case is different. Any result we achieve for one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Awards, Accolades & Recognitions

Best Lawyers

2015-2026 Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Plaintiffs

The National Trial Lawyers

2020-2021 Top 100 Trial Lawyers: South Carolina

Lawdragon

2019 Lawdragon Legends

2010-2024 Lawdragon 500

2019-2025 Lawdragon 500 Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers
Consumer Fraud, Personal Injury, Terrorism

2019-2025 Lawdragon 500 Plaintiff Financial Lawyers
Anti-Terrorism, Consumer Fraud, Human Rights, Whistleblower

National Law Journal

2020 Elite Women of the Plaintiffs' Bar

2018 Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Trailblazers

The Legal 500 United States

2016-2018 Dispute resolution - product liability, mass tort and class action - toxic tort - plaintiff
*Although it endorses this lawyer, The Legal 500 United States is not a Motley Rice client.

Public Justice Foundation

2016 Trial Lawyers of the Year

Benchmark Plaintiff

2012-2013 National “Litigation Star”: civil rights/human rights, mass tort/product liability

2012-2014 South Carolina “Litigation Star”: environmental, human rights, mass tort, securities

2014 Top 150 Plaintiff Women in Litigation list: South Carolina - environmental, human rights, mass tort, securities

South Carolina Lawyers Weekly

2017 Leadership in Law Honoree

ALM Southeastern Legal Awards

2025 Best Mentor

Blog Posts

September 11, 2025

9/11 Families Pass Another Step Toward Their Day in Court Against Saudi Arabia

by: Jodi Westbrook Flowers

September 11, 2023

For more than two decades since September 11, 2001 attacks, the struggle for justice continues

by: Jodi Westbrook Flowers

September 9, 2021

Twenty years after September 11, 2001: Major Milestones Causes, Not Just Cases

by: Jodi Westbrook Flowers

News

August 28, 2025

Federal Judge denies Saudi Arabia Motion to Dismiss in 9/11 families lawsuit

by: Motley Rice

May 19, 2025

Predatory Behavior Toward Teens Evident in Former Facebook Executive Testimony

by: Motley Rice

Areas of Practice (7)

  • Anti-Terrorism
  • Consumer Fraud Protection
  • Human Rights
  • Personal Injury Lawsuits
  • Public Client
  • Technology and Media
  • Whistleblower Claims

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
College of Charleston, B.A., magna cum laude, 1989
Law School Attended:
University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., 1993 Carolina Legal Scholar
Year of First Admission:
1993
Admission:
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina; 1993, South Carolina; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second, Fourth, and District of Columbia Circuits
Memberships:

Associations

Litigation Counsel of America, fellow

American Association for Justice

South Carolina Association for Justice

American Bar Association, SIL-International Human Rights Committee

South Carolina Bar Association, SC Women Lawyers

Charleston Bar Association

Daughters of the American Revolution

The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Reported Cases:
Casework: Social Media School Districts Lawsuit: School districts nationwide are suing social media companies. Find out whether your district is eligible to sue.; Technology and Media; Active Case; Defective Vehicle Lawsuit: Accident victims might be eligible to file a defective vehicle lawsuit to seek justice for their injuries. Learn more about filing a claim here.; Transportation Accident Lawsuits; Active Case; Wrongful Death Lawsuits: Survivors can seek compensation for a loved one's fatal injury. Learn more about wrongful death lawsuits; Personal Injury Lawsuits; Active Case; Hamas Terrorist Attack Lawsuit: We believe that the innocent victims of terrorist attacks and their families should be afforded every right to hold the responsible parties accountable for their actions.; Anti-Terrorism Lawsuit; Active Case; Snapchat Lawsuit: Teen Mental Health Harms: Snapchat users who experienced mental health harm due to the app's features may qualify to file a lawsuit.; Technology and Media; Active Case; TikTok Lawsuits: TikTok is facing lawsuits over mental health harms alleged to be caused by its design. Learn more about these claims here.; Technology and Media; Active Case; YouTube Lawsuit: Parents and young adults are suing YouTube over alleged mental health harm. Learn about YouTube lawsuits.; Technology and Media; Active Case; GM Smart Driver Lawsuit: Numerous lawsuits have since been filed in multiple states against General Motors, OnStar, LexisNexis and Verisk.; Consumer Fraud Protection; Instagram Lawsuit: People are filing Instagram lawsuits, alleging harms from addiction and other mental health issues. Plaintiffs claim the platform is designed to maximize use at the cost of young people's well-being.; Technology and Media; Active Case; Facebook Teen Mental Health Lawsuit: Facebook mental health lawsuits allege that parent company, Meta Platforms, Inc., should be held accountable for how its app is designed to encourage compulsive use and addictive behavior; Technology and Media; Active Case; Teen Social Media Harm Lawsuit: Compulsive social media use has caused some children and teens to develop mental health issues, like depression and tendencies for self-harm. Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies to hold them accountable.; Technology and Media Consumer Fraud Protection; Active Case; Meta Lawsuit: Meta lawsuits allege that the social media giant's Instagram and Facebook platforms are harming the well-being of American minors. State Attorneys General, school districts and parents have all filed lawsuits blaming Meta algorithms for a youth mental health crisis. Learn more about these Meta lawsuit claims and cases.; Technology and Media; Active Case
ISLN:
900396531

Payment Information

Other Information
Free initial consultation

Peer Reviews

4.4/5.0 (11 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® Distinguished Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.4/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.4/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.4/5.0
  • Communication

    4.4/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.4/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 12/07/10 in Complex Litigation

    Ms. Flowers is one of the finest complex litigation lawyers practicing in the United States. She is brilliant, persuasive, committed, of the highest moral and ethical character and devoted to her clients. I have been privileged to work alongside her... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Member on 02/17/11 in Negligence

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Principal on 12/07/10 in Torts

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Sole Practitioner on 11/22/10 in Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 11/21/10 in Federal Civil Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 11/21/10 in International Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 11/21/10 in Complex Litigation

    Ms. Flowers is an outstanding attorney

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 10/02/14 in Litigation

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 05/04/12 in Complex and Multi-District Litigation

    Jodi handles very complex litigation and has trememdous capability.

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Sole Practitioner on 02/17/11 in Litigation

Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Jodi Westbrook Flowers

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.