John T. McGrath, Jr.

John T. McGrath, Jr.: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey
  • Shareholder at Marshall Dennehey
  • 50 Glenmaura National Boulevard, Moosic, PA 18507
    View John T. McGrath, Jr.'s office location
  • John "Jack" McGrath is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. He focuses his practice on the defense of auto liability, representing over a thousand automobile cases to conclusion.
  • Overall Rating

    5.0
    .
    15 Reviews
  • Overall Rating

    5.0
    .
    15 Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #3 in weekly profile views out of 132 Attorneys in Moosic, PA
    • #85,092 in weekly profile views out of 2,343,578 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

John (Jack) is a member of the Casualty Department and co-chair of the firm's auto liability practice group. He focuses his practice on the defense of auto liability, representing over a thousand automobile cases to conclusion. The majority of cases ended in defense verdicts or verdicts lower than the settlement offers. Jack is also the managing shareholder and casualty supervising attorney of the firm's Scranton office with responsibility for the daily operations and oversight of the office's attorneys and support staff.

Jack is a graduate of Penn State University and a former member of law enforcement, having worked for the Lackawanna Sheriff's Department. While attending the Widener University School of Law, Jack worked as the commercial sales manager for ADT Security Systems in Philadelphia and southern New Jersey from 1988 through 1996.

Jack joined Marshall Dennehey in January of 1997 and became a shareholder in 2004. He is currently the lead attorney for the Dunmore High School Mock Trial Team and a basketball coach in his community.

Honors & awards

AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell

The Best Lawyers in America, Insurance Law; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
2024-2026

Year joined

1997

Results

Summary Judgment for Marshall Dennehey Client Only, in Multi-defendant Action.

General Liability
May 11, 2018

We obtained summary judgment in a general liability case in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff was an employee of a recently-renovated resort when a solid wooden panel fell down and struck her in the head, causing serious injuries. The plaintiff alleged improper design, manufacture, and installation of the panel against a number of the defendant contractors and subcontractors. It was unclear as to which defendant actually installed the panel.

Thought Leadership

98 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

August 20, 2025
Marshall Dennehey is proud to highlight the firm’s 98 attorneys who have been recognized in the 2026 editions of The Best Lawyers in America and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America. Less than 6% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S.

On the Pulse...Our Scranton, Pennsylvania, Office

Scranton
June 1, 2023
The Scranton office of Marshall Dennehey is now in its 30th year. The firm began in Scranton with two attorneys practicing workers’ compensation law. Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Automobile Liability
  • General Liability
  • Health Care Liability
  • Catastrophic Claims Litigation

Education & Credentials

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 3118, Moosic, PA 18507
University Attended:
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, B.A., Criminal Justice, 1985
Law School Attended:
Widener University School of Law, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, J.D., 1996
Year of First Admission:
1996
Admission:
1996, Pennsylvania; 1996, U.S. District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania
Memberships:

Associations & Memberships

•American Board of Trial Advocates
•Lackawanna County Bar Association
•Luzerne County Bar Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Defense of several auto cases in which the plaintiffs were killed. In each of these cases the demand was far in excess of the policy limits.; Defense of numerous auto cases involving pedestrians. Many of these cases have been tried to defense verdicts where the plaintiffs' injuries far exceeded the available coverage.; Defense of a hospital where the plaintiff was one of their own staff physicians who had a seizure while at work and was unable to return to his position as a physician. The allegations were that more should have been done initially when he had the seizure and the hospital should have been better equipped to deal with such situations. The lost wages alleged in this matter were over $7 million.; Defended an auto case in which the plaintiff was killed and plaintiff's counsel evoked the Dead Man's Rule. We were able to show that his expert, a state police officer, had interviewed our insured, thereby negating the Dead Man's Rule. The Superior Court agreed with our argument, and the defense verdict that we obtained in this litigation was upheld.; Defended an oncologist in a case where the plaintiff, an ophthalmologist who claimed he could no longer work, had multiple experts, including vocational, economic, psychiatric, orthopedic, and neurological practitioners. The initial demand was for our policy limits of $500,000. Through the use of our experts in a non-binding mediation, we were able to show the plaintiffs' experts would not hold up in front of a jury, and the case resolved for an amount far below the policy limits.; Obtained defense verdicts in several auto cases in northeast Pennsylvania where the underinsured motorist claims had gone to arbitration and six-figure awards have been granted. Most involved a minor impact with just soft tissue injuries.; Published Works: The Relationship Between the Handling Attorney and the Claims Professional in Auto Liability, Defense Digest, Vol. 22, No. 1, March 2016
ISLN:
912186427

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (15 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.9/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    5.0/5.0
  • Judgment

    5.0/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    5.0/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 10/20/21 in Insurance

    I have tried numerous cases against Atty McGrath. He is a very skilled litigator who has learned the art of trial work.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Principal on 02/04/21 in Insurance

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 01/18/21 in Automobile Insurance

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 01/18/21 in Personal Injury

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 01/15/21 in Automobile Insurance

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 01/15/21 in Automobile Accidents

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 01/09/21 in Personal Injury

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 01/08/21 in Automobile Insurance

    Very skilled trial counsel. He understands the art of persuasion.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 01/07/21 in Automobile Insurance

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 01/07/21 in Personal Injury

    Attorney McGrath is a seasoned and well-respected member of our local legal community, by both the Bench and Bar. John has a quick wit and sharp legal mind, and is a straight-shooter and man of his word. I would recommend him highly for a solid an... Read more

    Read more
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Affiliations

CLM

Location

Contact John T. McGrath, Jr.

Contact Information:

570-496-0567  Fax

www.marshalldennehey.com

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.