Kevin Todorow

Open for Business
no photo

Biography

Kevin is a member of the Professional Liability Department where he focuses his practice on appellate advocacy, including post-trial motions and appeals.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Kevin served as a Judge Advocate in the United States Army, first working in military justice, then representing soldiers convicted at courts-martial on appeal and arguing before the Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Kevin also served in the chambers of the Honorable Anne E. Lazarus of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, where he drafted memoranda and opinions on a wide range of criminal and civil cases.

Kevin graduated from Penn State University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics. After working in advertising for several years, he attended Temple University School of Law, where he received his juris doctor. While at Temple, Kevin was a member of the law review as a staff editor and an editorial board member.

Year joined

2024

Thought Leadership

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reaffirms Pennsylvania’s Statutory Employer Doctrine

Philadelphia - Headquarters
Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice
January 1, 2026
Immunity under Pennsylvania’s Worker’s Compensation Act is a powerful tool against tort liability-but the viability of the statutory employer doctrine was called into question when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted review to

See more ›

Areas of Practice (1)

  • Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Pennsylvania State University, B.S., 2011
Law School Attended:
Temple UniversityBeasley School of Law, J.D., 2018
Year of First Admission:
2018
Admission:
2018, Pennsylvania; 2022, Supreme Court of the United States; 2022, Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; 2022, U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Memberships:

Associations & memberships

Temple American Inn of Court, 2017
Philadelphia Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Successfully secured reconsideration following the denial of summary judgment motion in a construction accident case. The plaintiff, represented by a prominent personal injury firm, demanded $35 million. Though the court initially denied summary judgment, the team argued for reconsideration following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Yoder. Two weeks before jury selection, the Court of Common Pleas granted our motion-an outcome that is highly uncommon in Philadelphia-providing a decisive victory for our clients.; Obtained dismissal of clients by Summary Judgment in a Philadelphia premises liability case in which we represented both the landowner and tenant. The plaintiff originally demanded $2 million, later reduced to $800,000. Although our clients were responsible for sidewalk maintenance, the plaintiff's deposition testimony confirmed she tripped on a smaller portion of an alleged defect which was larger in other areas of the sidewalk. We successfully argued that this portion was de minimis and not actionable under Pennsylvania law. Despite a comprehensive opposition and a Motion for Reconsideration, the Court agreed with our arguments, dismissing all claims against our clients with prejudice.
ISLN:
1000392024

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Kevin Todorow

Contact Information:

marshalldennehey.com/attorneys/kevin-todorow

Required Fields

Required Fields

Clear All Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.