Mathew Paul Jasinski

Open for Business
Mathew Paul Jasinski: Attorney with Motley Rice LLC

Biography

Mathew represents whistleblowers in qui tam cases under the False Claims Act. He also represents consumers, businesses, and governmental entities in class-action and complex cases involving the Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA), unfair trade practices, commercial, and securities.

Mathew’s litigation experience includes all aspects of trial work, from case investigation to appeal. He has represented plaintiffs in class actions involving such claims as breach of contract and unfair trade practices. He has experience in complex commercial cases regarding claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty and has represented an institutional investor in its efforts to satisfy a judgment obtained against the operator of a Ponzi scheme. Mathew obtained a seven-figure arbitration award in a case involving secondary liability for an investment advisor’s conduct under the Uniform Securities Act. He played a leadership role in litigation against Wells Fargo, which resulted in a $79 million settlement on behalf of financial advisors whose deferred compensation was forfeited, in alleged violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). He was part of the team that secured a $160 million settlement to resolve claims of alleged unpaid overtime on behalf of nurse practitioners and physicians’ assistants employed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. He also helped to reach a $12.5 million settlement to resolve claims that alleged cancer care provider 21st Century Oncology failed to protect private information for millions of patients in a 2015 data breach.

Mathew also supports the firm's social media litigation practice, advising on questions at the intersection of the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. And he contributes to the firm’s appellate group, having argued cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Circuits, the Connecticut Appellate Court, the Connecticut Supreme Court, and the Delaware Supreme Court.

Prior to joining Motley Rice in 2009, Mathew practiced complex commercial and business litigation at a large defense firm. He began his legal career as a law clerk for Justice David M. Borden (ret.) of the Connecticut Supreme Court. During law school, Mathew served as executive editor of the Connecticut Law Review and judging director of the Connecticut Moot Court Board. He placed first in various moot court and mock court competitions, including the Boston region mock trial competition of the American Association for Justice. As an undergraduate, Mathew served on the board of associate directors for the University of Connecticut’s honors program and was recognized with the Donald L. McCullough Award for his student leadership.

Mathew continues to demonstrate civic leadership in the local Hartford community. He is secretary of the board of directors for the Hartford Symphony Orchestra and an elder of the Asylum Hill Congregational Church. On October 15, 2020, Connecticut Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard A. Robinson appointed Mathew to serve as a member of the Client Security Fund Committee. Mathew was also appointed by Speaker Matthew D. Ritter of the Connecticut House of Representatives to serve on the board of trustees for the Connecticut Tobacco and Health Trust Fund. Mathew was previously a commissioner of the Hartford Parking Authority and served on the city’s Charter Revision Commission.

Published Works

“On the Causes and Consequences of and Remedies for Interstate Malapportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives” (Jasinski and Ladewig, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 6, Issue 1, March 2008)

“Hybrid Class Actions: Bridging the Gap Between the Process Due and the Process that Functions” (Jasinski and Narwold), The Brief, Fall 2009

*Please remember that every case is different. Any result we achieve for one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

Awards, Accolades & Recognitions

Connecticut Super Lawyers

Rising Stars list
2013-2021 Business litigation; Class action/mass torts; Appellate

Lawdragon

2019-2025 Lawdragon 500 Plaintiff Financial Lawyers
Securities, Whistleblower, Consumer Fraud

Connecticut Law Tribune

2018 “New Leaders in Law”

Hartford Business Journal

2009 Forty Under 40

Blog Posts

July 6, 2023

Social media’s grip on teen mental health

by: Laura K. Stemkowski

January 8, 2021

Clicking with caution: Cybersecurity data breach risks are higher than ever Causes, Not Just Cases

by: Jodi Westbrook Flowers

August 12, 2020

Denied business interruption insurance payouts due to COVID-19 losses, some business owners may find justice in civil courts Causes, Not Just Cases

by: John A. Baden IV

News

January 27, 2026

Preliminary Approval of $110 Million Settlement in In re Wells Fargo & Company Hiring Practices Derivative Litigation

by: Motley Rice

April 28, 2025

The history and legacy of Workers’ Memorial Day

by:
M. Nolan We

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Consumer Fraud Protection
  • Securities Class Actions
  • Technology and Media
  • Whistleblower Claims

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Connecticut, B.A., summa cum laude, 2003
Law School Attended:
University of Connecticut School of Law, J.D., with high honors, 2006
Year of First Admission:
2006
Admission:
Connecticut; New York; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Federal Circuits; U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut and Southern District of New York
Memberships:

Associations

•American Association for Justice
•American Bar Association
•Connecticut Bar Association
•Oliver Ellsworth Inn of Court
•Phi Beta Kappa

Reported Cases:
Casework: Social Media Harm Verdicts: Review social media lawsuit verdicts, MDL developments and trial results involving youth mental health claims against social media platforms.; Qui Tam Whistleblower: A qui tam whistleblower can report & stop fraud against the government. See how qui tam lawyers help.; Pandemic Fraud: Pandemic fraud was the misuse of COVID-19 aid. Learn more about filing this type of whistleblower claim.; Defense Contractor Fraud: Learn what qualifies as defense contractor fraud, how to report it and whistleblower protections under the False Claims Act.; Government Grant Fraud: Whistleblowers should report government grant fraud. Learn what this fraud is and how you're protected.; Medicaid Fraud: Learn more about Medicaid fraud, including what it is, how to report it and its legal ramifications.; Medicare Fraud: Private citizens can report Medicare fraud and file legal claims on behalf of the U.S. government.; Social Media School Districts Lawsuit: School districts nationwide are suing social media companies. Find out whether your district is eligible to sue.; Snapchat Lawsuits: Teen Mental Health Harms: Snapchat's features have been linked to mental health issues in young people. Learn about the Snapchat lawsuit and who may qualify.; TikTok Lawsuits: TikTok is facing lawsuits over mental health harms alleged to be caused by its design. Learn more about these claims here.; YouTube Lawsuits: Thousands have filed lawsuits alleging YouTube deliberately designed its site to encourage dangerous behaviors in teens and children. Learn more here.; Instagram Lawsuits: People are filing Instagram lawsuits, alleging harms from addiction and other mental health issues. Plaintiffs claim the platform is designed to maximize use at the cost of young people's well-being.
ISLN:
918588577

Payment Information

Other Information
Free initial consultation

Peer Reviews

This lawyer does not have peer reviews.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Mathew Paul Jasinski

Contact Information

Preferred contact method
reCAPTCHA is required Invalid reCAPTCHA

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.