Nathan T. Danielson

Representative Matters: Siegle v. NextGear Capital, Inc., 19A-CC-1467, 2019 WL 6646743 (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 6, 2019) (unpublished disposition) (securing dismissal of appeal of client's default judgment against borrowers); Perron on behalf of Jackson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 845 F.3d 852 (7th Cir. 2017) (affirming District Court and finding that client mortgage servicer did not breach implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and that borrowers' RESPA claims against client failed as a matter of law); RYYZ, LLC v. Fannie Mae, 48 N.E.3d 389 (Table), 2016 WL 634113 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016) (unpublished disposition) (affirming trial court's entry of default judgment in favor of mortgagee client based on loan defendants' numerous discovery violations); Goloverya v. Nextgear Capital, Inc., 44 N.E.3d 839 (Table), 2015 WL 9467407 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (unpublished disposition) (affirming default judgment in favor of client and upholding trial court's denial of loan borrower's motion to set aside judgment as void for lack of personal jurisdiction); Turner v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 45 N.E.3d 1257 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (affirming trial court's enforcement of mediated settlement agreement in favor of mortgagee client after mortgagor breached agreement and trial court's denial of mortgagor's motion to dismiss); Jaffri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 26 N.E.3d 635 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (affirming Trial Rule 12(B)(6) dismissal of borrower's counterclaims filed in response to client's mortgage foreclosure action); Mains v. Citibank, N.A., 18 N.E.3d 319 (Table), 2014 WL 3817700 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (unpublished disposition) (affirming summary judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of client and upholding trial court's denial of loan borrower's motion to correct error based on the alleged discovery of new evidence); Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Corpening, 12 N.E.3d 994 (Table), 2014 WL 2001955 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (unpublished disposition) (reversing trial court's determination that client was not an equitable assignee of a mortgage despite the fact that client held a note corresponding to the mortgage, and concluding that client was a valid assignee of the mortgage); Fed. Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Stern, 6 N.E.3d 509 (Table), 2014 WL 840977 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (unpublished disposition) (reversing trial court's entry of summary judgment against client, a foreclosing mortgagee, and remanding case to trial court for further proceedings); Weinreb v. Fannie Mae, 993 N.E.2d 223 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (affirming summary judgment for client, holding guarantor personally liable for $1.8 million deficiency balance following foreclosure under limited recourse guaranty and enforcing prepayment premium as a liquidated damages provision), transfer denied, 998 N.E.2d 213 (Ind. 2013); Lunsford v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas as Trustee, 996 N.E.2d 815 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (affirming summary judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of client against land contract purchaser who failed to record a prior land contract before client's mortgage was recorded); Buridi v. RL BB Financial, LLC, 994 N.E.2d 762 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013) (unpublished disposition) (affirming trial court's denial of personal guarantor's Indiana Trial Rule 60(B) motion asserting that client's judgment should be set aside based on newly discovered evidence); KMC Real Estate Investors, LLC v. RL BB Financial, LLC, 968 N.E.2d 873 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (unpublished disposition) (affirming summary judgment for client on investors' personal guaranties of $20 million construction loan); Citizens State Bank of New Castle v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 949 N.E.2d 1195 (Ind. 2011) (reversing trial court judgment against client and remanding with instructions to enter judgment in favor of client indicating client's lien rights were unaffected by foreclosure case and mortgagee is not entitled to strict foreclosure against client); Alaska Seaboard Partners Ltd. P'ship v. Hood, 949 N.E.2d 1247 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (affirming summary judgment for client, finding that plaintiff was estopped from bringing unreasonable and groundless foreclosure action and that client was entitled to an award of attorneys' fees); Ellis v. M&I Bank, 960 N.E.2d 187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (affirming summary judgment for client on eviction of tenant following completion of prior mortgage foreclosure action);