Patrick S. Schoenburg

Offers Video Calls | Open for Business
Patrick S. Schoenburg: Attorney with Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Patrick Schoenburg has successfully represented clients at trial in state and federal court, in appeals, arbitration hearings and in the negotiation of contracts, license agreements and other transactions. He has particular expertise in defending mass tort, environmental, toxic tort and professional liability claims involving technical issues and has developed innovative strategies for attacking questionable scientific evidence. His practice includes defense and prosecution of commercial and employment claims and client counseling regarding contract and related business matters. Patrick’s articles have been published by the ABA, Harris-Martin, CEB and Mealey’s and he has been quoted on legal issues in the New York Times and leading industry publications. He is a co-author of CEB’s guidebook for handling mold litigation in California. After graduating from the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, where he was a member of the Southern California Law Review, Patrick served as a law clerk to the Hon. A. Andrew Hauk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Patrick has frequently been selected to serve as lead and national counsel by clients faced with mass tort claims. He was lead defense counsel in the Federal Multi-District Litigation that followed the 2012 Hantavirus outbreak at Yosemite National Park, represented the target defendant in litigation following a 2018 multi-State E. coli outbreak and recently defended a school district in Washington State against 200 claims of PCB exposure. On the commercial side, Patrick represents both insurance and corporate clients in cost recovery/indemnity actions. In the last two years, he has recovered $1.8 million and the return of real property valued at $2 million for these clients.

Newsroom

News

•Covid-19 Liability Risk: Can It Be Waived?
Newsroom, 7.24.20
•Litigation Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic: Emerging Trends in Virus Related Claims
Newsroom, 5.20.20
•WSHB Elevates Ten Partners to Defined Equity Status
Newsroom, 1.16.20
•Key Changes In Newly Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Newsroom, 2.19.16

Publications

•Avoiding A Toxic Situation: Lessons From Bard v. Monsanto
Article, 1.5.22
•The Return of Mold
Article, CLM Magazine, 12.13.21
•A Withering Assault
Publications, 6.14.19
•A New Era in Toxic Torts?
Publications, 9.20.18
•WSHB Toxic Tort Update - California Defendants Lose Battle In Long Running War Over Toxic Tort Pleading
Publications, 8.5.15
•Changing Demographics Drive Jury Verdicts and Impact Claims Analysis In California's Central Valley
Publications, 3.11.14
•Mold Litigation Update: Current Trends in this Once-Emerging Tort
Publications, 10.8.11
•Litigation Watch: Benzene - New Study Focuses on Benzene Biomarkers - Will Results Impact Litigation?
Publications, 10.1.07
•Real Property Law Reporter: Analyzing Mold Claims (Part I)
Publications, 1.1.06
•Harris Martin Litigation Watch: Welding Fumes
Article, 9.1.05
A Roundup of Covid-19 Litigation , CLM Magazine (December 2020)
Can Covid-19 Liability Be Waived?, Risk Management Magazine (September 1, 2020)
Assessing Personal Injury Liability from Covid-19, Risk Management Magazine (May 1, 2020)
Looking for Liability: Assessing COVID-19 Risks by Looking at Other Infectious Diseases, CLM Magazine (April 2, 2020)
Sparring Over Spores: Apartment Management, Vol. XLI, Number 10 (October 2010)
Air Testing For Mold Deemed Unreliable by Centers for Disease Control, California Apartment Association News (July 2010)
Conflicting Appellate Decisions Create Uncertainty Regarding Defenses In California Toxic Tort Litigation, Legal Insights: Claims Resources And Solutions, Issue Management (Fall/Winter 2009)
Handling Mold Litigation in California, CEB Action Guide, Continuing Education of the Bar, 3rd, 4th & 5th Editions (2005, 2007 & 2009)
New Study Focuses on Benzene Biomarkers: Will Results Impact Litigation?, Martin Litigation Watch: Benzene (October 2007)
Mold Litigation 2007: Current Trends In This Once Emerging Tort, Claims Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2 (May 2007)
Evidence of Exposure: Evolving Standards of Proof in Benzene Litigation, Mealey’s Litigation Report: Benzene, Vol. 1, # 2 (July 2006)
Analyzing Mold Claims From A Scientific and Medical Perspective: What Real Property Owners, Managers, Developers and Their Attorneys Need To Know, Continuing Education of the Bar - Real Property Law Reporter, Volume 29, Numbers 1 & 3 (January & May 2006)
The Return Of Privity As A Barrier To Warranty Claims In Welding Rod and Other Occupational Exposure Cases, Harris Martin Litigation Watch: Welding Rods (2005)
Evaluating and Challenging Expert Witnesses in California Mold Exposure Litigation, Continuing Education of the Bar - Real Property Law Reporter, Volume 27, Number 1 (January 2004)
Latest Developments in Mold Exposure Litigation, American Bar Association Natural Resources & Environment Journal, Volume 17, Number 2 (Fall 2002)

Community Activities

•Central Valley Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Light the Night Executive Committee - 2018 to present; Executive Challenge Fundraising winner - 2018.
•Former member of State Board of Governors, Local Advisory Committees (Los Angeles and Fresno) and Mentor of the Year - VIP Mentors, Inc.
•Member - Pro Bono Panel - United States District Court, Eastern District of California

In the News

•Kings County Superior Court Grants Summary Judgment in High-Stakes Products Liability Case
•Avoiding A Toxic Situation: Lessons From Bard v. Monsanto
•The Return of Mold
•Covid-19 Liability Risk: Can It Be Waived?

Honors & Recognitions

•AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell (2005 - Present)
•Super Lawyer (2012)

Areas of Practice (12)

  • Agricultural Law
  • Commercial and Business Litigation
  • Corporate
  • Employment
  • Environmental
  • Legionnaires'/Infectious Disease
  • Mass Torts and Class-Action Defense
  • Professional Liability
  • Real Estate and Land Use
  • Toxic Tort and Occupational Exposure
  • Transportation
  • Legal Malpractice

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of California, Santa Barbara, B.A., 1987
Law School Attended:
University of Southern California, J.D., 1992
Year of First Admission:
1992
Admission:
1992, California
Reported Cases:
Experience: Kings County Superior Court Grants Summary Judgment in High-Stakes Products Liability Case; 9.10.24; WSHB Obtains Dismissal Of Two Massive Water Quality/Plumbing Class Actions; 1.18.19; 2017 Mold Litigation Update - Big Dollars, Questionable Claims Reflect Continuing Trends; 2.13.17; 2014 Annual Mold Litigation Update: Courts, Medical Professionals Continue to Struggle with Assessment of Mold Claims; 5.28.15; 2015 Annual Mold Litigation Update; 4.29.15; 2013 Annual Mold Litigation Update: Volume Of Cases Declines, Plaintiffs Score Some Victories; 2.26.13; 2012 Mold Litigation Update - News Stories, Studies Continue To Focus on Mold Despite Lack Of Large Personal Injury Verdicts; 3.20.12; WSHB Toxic Tort Update - California Defendants Lose Battle In Long Running War Over Toxic Tort Pleading; 9.27.11; 2009 Annual Mold Litigation Update; 1.9.09
ISLN:
909926296

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Patrick S. Schoenburg

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.