Ryan M. Krescanko

no photo
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Ryan is a member of the Casualty Department. He practices in Pennsylvania and West Virginia and devotes his practice to the defense of mass toxic tort matters arising out of exposure to asbestos and benzene. He handles the defense of mass toxic tort matters from case initiation through negotiation to trial, including pleadings, oral and written discovery, motions practice, and client reporting. Ryan also represents clients in the areas of Federal black lung and general liability, defending matters involving premises liability, personal injury and commercial litigation. With over seventeen years' experience as a litigator, Ryan routinely handles all aspects of litigation from case inception and investigation to trial.

Ryan attended the University of Pittsburgh graduating with a B.A. in Political Science, with Dean's List honors. Ryan then attended Duquesne University School of Law where he obtained his juris doctor.

Following graduation, Ryan worked for a Pittsburgh financial services organization with experience in trust and estate specialization. He then worked for a Pittsburgh law firm for nearly ten years in a diverse practice which included the defense of mass toxic tort matters, employment discrimination cases, general institutional and commercial liability matters, premises liability matters, workers' compensation and federal black lung. There, he handled all aspects of litigation from case inception through assisting at trial. Ryan also conducted EEO-mandated employment training, prepared employee handbooks and employment policies, and counseled corporate clients and human resources professionals relative to employment discrimination issues. In addition, he prepared basic estate documents for private clients.

Ryan was admitted to the bar of Pennsylvania in 2003, and the bar of West Virginia in 2016.

Ryan is a member of the Allegheny County Bar Association and Pennsylvania Bar Association.

Year joined

2017

Thought Leadership

Marshall Dennehey Announces 2022 New Shareholder Class -- With 10 women and 7 men, the class has one of the highest percentages of women in the firm’s 60-year history

January 3, 2022
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin is pleased to announce that 17 attorneys, 10 women and 7 men, have been elevated to shareholder, effective January 1, 2022.

Defending Depositions Against Dying Deponents in Asbestos Litigation

Pittsburgh
Asbestos & Mass Tort Litigation
January 28, 2020

Paying Your Fair Share After Roverano v. John Crane

Pittsburgh
Asbestos & Mass Tort Litigation
December 10, 2018
Key Points: Defense Digest, Vol. 24, No. 4, December 2018. Defense Digest is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers.

Areas of Practice (5)

  • Asbestos and Mass Tort Litigation
  • General Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Employment Law
  • Workers' Compensation

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Pittsburgh, B.A., 1999
Law School Attended:
Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University, J.D., 2002
Year of First Admission:
2003
Admission:
2003, Pennsylvania; 2003, U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania; 2010, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit; 2010, U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit; 2016, West Virginia; 2016, U.S. District Court Southern District of West Virginia; 2025, U.S. District Court Northern District of West Virginia
Memberships:

Associations & Memberships

•Allegheny County Bar Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Association

Birth Information:
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, October 15, 1976
Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Summary judgment granted in a mass toxic tort case in which the plaintiff alleged para-occupational exposure to products distributed by a local supplier during the employment of her family members at a steel making facility; Summary judgment obtained in a mass toxic tort case for a premises client in which the plaintiff alleged occupational exposure to asbestos during his employment at the client's industrial facility.; Summary judgment obtained in a mass toxic tort case for a client manufacturer where the plaintiff alleged direct occupational exposure to the client's product at a steel making facility.; Summary judgment obtained in a mass toxic tort case involving a client manufacturer and the plaintiff's allegations of bystander occupational exposure at a steel making facility.; Summary judgment obtained in a mass toxic tort case in which the plaintiff alleged para-occupational exposure to products distributed by a local supplier during the employment of her family members at a steel making facility.; Published Works: Defending Depositions Against Dying Deponents in Asbestos Litigation, The Legal Intelligencer's Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action Supplement, January 28, 2020; New Ruling in Pennsylvania Favors Asbestos Plaintiffs, Weightmans LLP Occupational Disease newsletter, December 2019; Paying Your Fair Share After Roverano v. John Crane, Defense Digest, December 2018, Vol. 24, No. 4;
ISLN:
919506082

Peer Reviews

4.4/5.0 (2 reviews)
Peer Reviewed
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.5/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.5/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.5/5.0
  • Communication

    4.5/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Ryan M. Krescanko

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.