Seth J. Schwartz

Open for Business
Seth J. Schwartz: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey
  • Shareholder at Marshall Dennehey
  • 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300, Philadelphia, PA 19103
    View Seth J. Schwartz's office location
  • Seth J. Schwartz is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin in the firm's Casualty Department. He provides legal counsel to commercial property owners/commercial property managers, amusement parks and recreational facilities, and insurance companies in Pennsylvania.
  • Overall Rating

    5.0
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #956 in weekly profile views out of 26,301 Attorneys in Philadelphia, PA
    • #85,092 in weekly profile views out of 2,343,578 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

A shareholder in the firm’s Casualty Department and recipient of Martindale-Hubbell’s highest AV Preeminent rating, Seth represents construction companies and contractors, trucking companies, bars, commercial property owners and managers, and amusement parks and insurers throughout Pennsylvania. His practice focuses on high-exposure matters involving catastrophic injury or death in the areas of construction accidents and defects, trucking, liquor liability, premises liability, and sports and amusement. An accomplished trial lawyer, Seth has tried numerous jury cases in Philadelphia and across eastern Pennsylvania, securing multiple defense verdicts.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Seth was a staff trial attorney for seven years at Nationwide Insurance. He handled general defense litigation including automobile liability, construction matters, and premises liability. Before joining Nationwide Insurance, Seth entered private practice at a small civil litigation firm in Philadelphia, where he handled a range of civil litigation from premises liability to complex product liability matters.

Seth was appointed to judge pro tem for the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and to the Investigative Division of the Philadelphia Bar Association's Commission on Judicial Selection and Retention.

Seth graduated from Temple University School of Law in 1992. He attended college at The American University where he graduated in 1988 with honors.

Honors & awards

AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell

BTI Client Service All-Star
2024

Year joined

2003

Pro Bono

Christian Legal Clinics of Philadelphia

Results

Consolidated Cases Successfully Transferred to Correct Venue

Construction Injury Litigation
February 5, 2024

We successfully transferred two consolidated cases involving alleged falls by construction workers from Philadelphia to Cumberland County. Our clients were located in Lancaster County, and the only codefendant was located in Philadelphia County. We filed preliminary objections as to venue, arguing that the codefendant was a “phantom” defendant named to obtain venue in Philadelphia County. The court was convinced by our arguments. This ruling cuts against the current trend of giving broad deference to plaintiffs on venue issues.

Thought Leadership

Seth J. Schwartz Named a BTI Consulting Group 2024 Client Service All-Star

Construction Injury Litigation
June 4, 2024
Seth J.

On the Pulse...Construction Injury Litigation Practice Group

Philadelphia - Headquarters
Pittsburgh
Construction Injury Litigation
December 1, 2023
Recent data released from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals that construction laborers accounted for 11.9% of all reported fatal falls, slips, or trips in 2020 across all occupations. Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No.

Classes/Seminars Taught

An Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 16, 2014

Commercial Defense Practice in New York, New Jersey & Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 5, 2014

Commercial Defense Practice in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 2013

Brief Overview of Pennsylvania Contractual Indemnity and Additional Insured Issues, Nationwide insurance Company, April 2012

Numerous presentations to property managers and insurance companies regarding effective claims handling and tender issues

Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association Annual Conference, 2007

Areas of Practice (7)

  • Construction Injury Litigation
  • Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation
  • Hospitality and Liquor Liability
  • Trucking & Transportation Liability
  • General Liability
  • Amusements, Sports and Recreation Liability
  • Premises and Retail Liability

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
American University, B.S.B.A., cum laude, 1988
Law School Attended:
Temple University Beasley School of Law, J.D., 1992
Year of First Admission:
1992
Admission:
1992, Pennsylvania; 1994, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Memberships:

Associations & Memberships

•International Amusement & Leisure Defense Association
•Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association
•Pennsylvania Bar Association
•Volunteer Attorney Christian Legal Clinics of Philadelphia

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Defense jury verdict in premises liability matter. Seth was the only defense attorney and Plaintiff had two lawyers during trial. Plaintiff argued spoliation of evidence, had back surgery and boarded over seven figures in damages. Seth developed inconsistencies during the cross examination of Plaintiff's witnesses, and argued that Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proof.; Defense jury verdict in premises liability matter. Seth again was the only defense attorney and Plaintiff had two lawyers during trial. Plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to preserve evidence. It is also noted that the defendant had witness issues with a former employee. Plaintiff was a grandfatherly gentlemen claiming a serious a hip injury. Seth introduced evidence that there were gaps in Plaintiff's story, and during Seth's cross examination of Plaintiff's liability expert, the expert admitted that he did not have his entire file, although he initially told the jury he did; and, he acknowledged that the Defendant was compliant with a different set of industry regulations which he omitted to discuss during direct examination.; Defense jury verdict in automobile rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving surgery and significant wage loss claim. Negligence was admitted to the jury. Significant credibility issues developed during the case, including Plaintiff's vocational expert admitting in front of the jury of failing to produce all discoverable documents. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict, although negligence was admitted.; Defense jury verdict in rear-end motor vehicle accident case. Negligence was admitted. Plaintiff alleged surgery and a significant vocational claim. Numerous inconsistencies were developed during trial involving the Plaintiff's reporting of the incident to the doctor. After deliberation, jury awarded a defense verdict.; Defense jury verdict in rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving two personal injury claims of multiple herniations and permanency. During trial, evidence was developed which revealed that Plaintiffs provided varying medical histories to different doctors. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict.; Defense jury verdict in premises liability case whereby the plaintiff, a pizza delivery person, allegedly fell on ice while delivering a pizza. During trial Plaintiff admitted on cross examination to observing alternative pathways and that he did not maintain a vigilant look out. The jury returned a defense verdict in favor of the homeowners.
ISLN:
900538955

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Seth J. Schwartz

Contact Information:

215-575-0856  Fax

www.marshalldennehey.com

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.