Stephen DeNittis, Esq.

Stephen DeNittis, Esq.: Attorney with DeNittis Osefchen Prince, P.C.
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Stephen P. DeNittis is the managing partner of DeNittis Osefchen Prince, P.C. An experienced consumer fraud class action litigator and catastrophic personal injury litigator, Mr. DeNittis and the firm have recovered over $500 million for victims of severe injury or corporate fraud in federal and state courts across the country. He currently serves as lead or co-lead counsel in many class actions currently pending in federal and state court. Since 1998, Mr. DeNittis has successfully served as lead or co-lead counsel in over two hundred (200) class actions involving consumer fraud, false advertising, food mislabeling, construction defects, wage and hour violations, RESPA violations and mass tort litigation throughout the country.

In 2013, he was designated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney, a high honor of achievement as only 1.5% of attorneys in New Jersey hold such a designation. He is also rated AV, the highest rating given by Martindale Hubbell, the country’s foremost legal directory. He has also been named to the a "Super Lawyer” list in New Jersey for the years 2013-2022.

In 2020, Mr. DeNittis also received two more high honors. He was named as on of America’s Top 100 High Stake Litigators for New Jersey, an honor less than one-half percent of active attorneys in the United States has received. In the same year he was also named as one of The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 Trial Lawyers in New Jersey, again a designation bestowed to less than 1% of attorneys nationally.

For the methodology as to how such organizations selected Mr. DeNittis see www.superlawyers.com, www.thenationaltriallawyers.org and www.top100highstakeslitigators.cpm/selection-methodology/.

Mr. DeNittis’ notable cases include (see disclaimer below):

In the last six years:Barba et al. v. Old Navy where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and obtained a class settlement wherein Old Navy offered $340 million in Purchase Certificates to a class of 34,000,000 consumers. The class alleged that Old Navy stores and website offered products with false reference prices which results in fake discounts and fake sales.

Andrews et al. v. Gap where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and obtained a class settlement class wherein Gap offered $240 million in Purchase Certificates for 24,000,000 consumers to receive free merchandise. The class alleged that Gap Factory Outlet and Banana Factory Outlet stores and website offered products with false reference prices which results in fake discounts and fake sales. Consumers received up to $12 in vouchers to obtain free products or use to receive discounts off products.

Coladonato v. JCrew where Mr. DeNittis served as one of the lead counsel and obtained a class settlement of $24 million on behalf of a class of 2.6 million New Jersey, New York and California consumers. The class alleged that JCrew Outlet stores and website offered products with false reference prices which resulted in fake discounts and fake sales. Consumers received up to $16 in vouchers to obtain free products or use to receive discounts off products.

Sekelew et al. v. Burlington where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and obtained a class settlement of $9.6 million on behalf of a class of 1,000,000 New Jersey consumers. The class alleged that Burlington stores and website offered products with false reference prices which resulted in fake discounts and fake sales. Consumers received up to $12 in vouchers to obtain free products or use to receive discounts off products.

Jones v. Empire Beauty Schools where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and obtained a $6.75 million common fund settlement on behalf of 300,000 consumers who received services and were allegedly overcharged at one of Empire’s 28 beauty school clinics located in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Spector v. TD Bank where Mr. DeNittis was one of the lead counsel and obtained a $9.4 million settlement on behalf of approximately 3,000,000 account holders of TD Bank. This case involved New Jersey consumer fraud claims against TD Bank’s for its faulty Penny Arcade Coin Counting Machines allegedly undercounting consumers’ money.

Krivy v. Jean Madeline Beauty Schools where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and obtained a $1.35 million settlement on behalf of 70,000 consumers who received services and were allegedly overcharged at one of Jean Madeline’s 3 beauty school clinics.

Anderson v. Redflex and Telliho v. American Traffic Solutions where Mr. DeNittis served as lead counsel and secured a $6.1 million settlement obtaining partial refunds for over 600,000 persons in New Jersey who received traffic violations by alleged faulty red light camera equipment located in 18 municipalities across the state. As a result of my suits, the red light camera program in New Jersey has been terminated.

Other notable cases in the last 15 years.France v. Merrill Lynch where Mr. DeNittis served as co-lead counsel in a wage an hour violation action and obtained final approval in 2009 of a $43.5 million class action settlement on behalf of a class of 22,000 Merrill Lynch stockbrokers in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Ingling v. Ryder Truck Rental where he obtained a $7 million dollar settlement on behalf a client who suffered a devastating brain injury as a result of a slip and fall that occurred in a parking lot in 2005. The settlement was recognized by The New Jersey Law Journal as the largest slip and fall settlement in the State of New Jersey for the year 2007 and still stands as the largest recovery for an individual in the State involving a person injured by a slip and fall;

DeMarco v. National Collector’s Mint where Mr. DeNittis was lead counsel and obtained a settlement valued at $9 million dollars on behalf of a class of 176,000 class members who were defrauded into purchasing a fake coin allegedly issued by the U.S. Mint to commemorate the “9/11” Terrorist Attack. The case was a matter of first impression in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under the Hobby Protection Act 15 U.S.C. § 2101(b) and is now a published opinion in the Federal Reporters. 229 F.R.D. 73 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).

Mr. DeNittis was also plaintiffs’ trial counsel in Barkers v. Public Service Electric and Gas (PSEG) where he obtained an order for PSEG to install excess flow valves or place cement protective bollards to approximately 2,800 residential and commercial gas meter sets located throughout the State of New Jersey. PSE&G negligently placed meters in a dangerous condition, in close proximity to persons’ driveways, garage doors or parking areas. As a result of Mr. DeNittis’ efforts in the case, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities proposed and adopted new rules and regulations in December of 2004 prohibiting any new or existing gas meters from being installed in the State of New Jersey within 3 feet of any garage door, driveway or parking area. Mr. DeNittis was also lead trial counsel in Schmoll v. J.S. Hovnanian, a class action that settled after four days of trial which resulted in J.S. Hovnanian repairing a construction defect found in 995 homes in the Holiday East development in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey.

DISCLAIMER: This information is an Advertisement. Case Results may vary depending on the particular facts of your case and legal circumstances. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Areas of Practice (9)

  • Trial Practice
  • Complex Litigation
  • Negligence
  • Personal Injury
  • Class Actions
  • Consumer Fraud
  • Products Liability
  • Construction Litigation
  • Wrongful Death

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
Rutgers University, B.A., Economics, 1992
Law School Attended:
Widener University School of Law, Harrisburg, J.D., 1997
Year of First Admission:
1997
Admission:
1997, New Jersey; 2012, U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee; 2018, U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania; 2012, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; 2006, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 2008, U.S. Supreme Court; 1997, Pennsylvania; 1997, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; 2020, New York; 2021, U.S. District Court, District of Southern New York; 2021, U.S. District Court, District of Eastern New York; 2021, U.S. District Court, District of Western New York
Memberships:
Camden (Member: Personal Injury Committee; Civil Practice Committee), Burlington (Member, Personal Injury Committee), Philadelphia, New Jersey State and American (Member, Class Action Committee) Bar Associations; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America.
Birth Information:
August 2, 1970
Reported Cases:
J.W. v. L.R. 325 N.J.Super. 543, 740 A.2d 146; DeMarco v. National Collector's Mint-Inc., 229 F.R.D. 73; Schmoll v. J.S. Hovnanian & Sons, LLC, WL 1520751, N.J. Super. Ch., February 9, 2006; The Tax Authority, Inc. v. Jackson Hewitt, 185 N.J. 39, 878 A.2d 855 (2006).
Certifications:
Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Certified Civil Trial Attorney, 2013 - present
ISLN:
914809430

Payment Information

Fixed Hourly Rates
Available
Other Information
Free initial consultation, Fixed fees available

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
2.3/5.0 (3 reviews)

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Stephen DeNittis, Esq.

Contact Information:

856-702-8121  Phone

www.denittislaw.com

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.