The managing partner of WSHB’s Sonoma County office, Steve is an accomplished litigator and is certified by The State Bar of California as a Specialist in Appellate Law. Known for his legal writing, analysis, and advocacy, Steve has handled or consulted on well over 100 appellate matters in multiple state and federal courts. His publications are cited on Westlaw as “additional resources” for close to 50 California statutes and Rules of Court. In addition, Steve handles trial level cases in a wide range of areas, including federal law, bodily injury, public entity defense, and others.
In addition to his appellate work, Steve's skills extend to areas involving complex federal and state law, government and public entity issues, premises liability, intellectual property, technology, and transportation. He is adept at accurately assessing risk and recommending cost-effective strategies that best serve his clients’ interests. He prides himself on his communication skills, commitment to ethics, and high-quality legal work. Steve has successfully resolved innumerable cases, whether through dispositive motions (and successful appeals), trial, or settlement.
Steve is also experienced in transactional matters, having negotiated, drafted, and counseled clients regarding purchase/sale contracts, confidentiality agreements, and other complex agreements involving land use, environmental issues, employment, construction, bodily injury, civil rights issues, product liability, and intellectual property rights.
Whatever the legal issue, Steve is a diligent, passionate, and professional advocate who works tirelessly to obtain the best possible results for his clients.
Newsroom
News
•Appellate Court Directs Entry of Summary Judgment for WSHB in Multi-Million Dollar Dog Bite Lawsuit
Trial Results, 12.11.25
•Court of Appeal Upholds Dismissal of Multi-Million Dollar Claim
Appellate Results, 12.4.24
•California Court of Appeal Upholds Dismissal for Failure to Bring Case To Trial
Appellate Results, 10.11.23
•WSHB Win in Complex Elder Abuse and Wrongful Death Suit
Trial Results, 8.30.23
•New Defined Equity Partners Celebrated at WSHB as 2023 Begins
Firm News, 1.9.23
•Managing Partner Steve Disharoon Achieves Distinguished Certification of Appellate Specialist from State Bar of California
Firm News, 9.6.22
•WSHB Expands in California: New Sonoma County Location
Newsroom, 6.26.20
•WSHB Names Eight New Partners
Newsroom, 1.29.18
•Winery Prevails in High Stakes Trademark Trial
Trial Results, 10.10.17
Publications
•California Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Fee Payment Rules: Section 1281.98 Is Reconstrued to Survive FAA Challenge, WSHB Case Update, December 29, 2025
•Understanding Appellate Fee Awards in California Discovery After Baer v. Tedder , WSHB Case Update, December 12, 2025
•E-Service Gotchas: When a Single Filing Starts (or Stops) the Appeal Countdown , WSHB Case Update, September 16, 2025
•Driver’s ‘Offline’ Status Shields Uber from Liability in Late-Night Pedestrian Accident, WSHB Case Update, February 18, 2025
•California Supreme Court Declares Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable Based on Principles of Unconscionability and Declines Severance of Unfair Terms , WSHB Case Update, December 26, 2024
•California Court of Appeal Upholds Admissibility of Medicare Eligibility, in an Implicit Rebuke of Pebley v. Santa Clara Organics, WSHB Case Update, September 17, 2024
•Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act Under Fire Once Again, WSHB Article, May 31, 2024
•Empowering Defendants: Appellate Ruling Unveils Hospital Lien Act , WSHB Case Update, November 29, 2023
•Is Arbitration a Good Idea for Your Business?, WSHB Article, November 7, 2023
•Taming the Flames, CLM Magazine, November 2023
•Court of Appeal Rules CCP Section 998 Applies after Stipulated Settlement, WSHB Case Update, August 31, 2023
•A Seismic Shift for Bodily Injury Claims, CLM Magazine, July 6, 2023
•Landmark Ruling: Appeals Court Shakes Up Defense Community with Forced Disclosure of Test Data , WSHB Case Update, May 31, 2023
•Availability of Remote Testimony Does Not Control Venue Determination, WSHB Case Update, September 19, 2022
•The Life of an Appellate Case (2022) 45-MAR L.A. Law. 16
•Where the Legal Winds Are Blowing, Construction Claims Magazine, June 15, 2028
•Pebley v. Santa Clara Opens the Door in California to Inflated Medical Damages Claims, WSHB Case Update, May 11, 2018
•Strategies for Restoring the Right to Repair Act by Challenging the Liberty Mutual and Burch Decisions, DRI Volume 18, Issue 4 (2014)
•Stafford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding: a Missed Opportunity to Restore Fourth Amendment Rights to School Children, 44 U.S.F. L. Rev. 659 (2010)
•California’s Broken Parole System: Flawed Standards and Insufficient Oversight Threaten the Rights of Prisoners, 44 U.S.F. L. Rev. 177 (2009)
In the News
•Appellate Court Directs Entry of Summary Judgment for WSHB in Multi-Million Dollar Dog Bite Lawsuit
•Court of Appeal Upholds Dismissal of Multi-Million Dollar Claim
•California Court of Appeal Upholds Dismissal for Failure to Bring Case To Trial
•WSHB Win in Complex Elder Abuse and Wrongful Death Suit
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
