Timothy J. Hartigan

Timothy J. Hartigan: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey
  • Shareholder at Marshall Dennehey
  • 620 Freedom Business Center, Suite 300, King Of Prussia, PA 19406
    View Timothy J. Hartigan's office location
  • Timothy J. Hartigan is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. He provides legal counsel to insured individuals and corporations who are defendants in claims primarily arising in the areas of premises liability, products liability, construction defects, and auto liability. Tim also represents homeowners sued for alleged failure to disclose pre-sale conditions of their homes to buyers, a practice referred to as real estate sellers disclosure liability.
  • Overall Rating

    4.5
    .
    11 Reviews
  • Overall Rating

    4.5
    .
    11 Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #33 in weekly profile views out of 929 Attorneys in King Of Prussia, PA
    • #85,092 in weekly profile views out of 2,343,578 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Timothy provides legal counsel to insured individuals and corporations who are defendants in claims arising in the areas of premises liability, product liability, construction defects, and auto liability. Tim also represents homeowners sued for alleged failure to disclose pre-sale conditions of their homes to buyers, a practice area referred to as real estate sellers disclosure liability. He has defended claims on behalf of companies in slip and fall cases, manufacturing design and defect cases, and failure to warn cases.

Tim has litigated multiple construction defect matters in Philadelphia and surrounding county courts involving stucco/ EIFS coated structures and water intrusion, both as the stucco contractor and on behalf of other trades. Stucco/ EIFS issues have also been involved in many of the seller's disclosure cases he has litigated. He has handled mold litigation that were contained within larger construction-defect related claims.

Tim's significant experience in this area has allowed him to develop a working familiarity with residential construction techniques and related liability issues. He has litigated more general construction defect issues, including building code compliance on behalf of general contractors performing casualty remediation on existing structures.

To date, Tim has tried roughly a dozen cases to verdict in state and federal courts in Pennsylvania. Hundreds more have been handled to a successful conclusion through public and private arbitration forums. Tim regularly serves as an arbitrator on cases in both Montgomery and Delaware Counties.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Tim was an associate at the law firm of Kelly, McLaughlin and Foster, after working at the law firm of Margolis Edelstein. At both firms, Tim primarily handled premises liability and automobile liability matters for the insurance company clients' policyholders. Tim also maintained a solo practice focusing exclusively on automobile and casualty subrogation for nearly eight years for over a dozen different insurance company clients.

Tim is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and Rutgers School of Law. He was the recipient of the American Jurisprudence Award for Achievement in the study of Torts while matriculating at Rutgers School of Law.

Year joined

2004

Results

Successful resolution of premises liability action.

General Liability
July 25, 2019

We successfully tried a premises liability action to a defense verdict in favor of a resident’s association in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, and also successfully defended against the plaintiff’s appeal. The plaintiff, who was a community resident (formerly married to a unit owner but not an owner herself), claimed that she tripped and fell on a tree branch on common area steps at night as a result of a burned out PECO-owned lamp, and that the Association failed to ensure that the light was fixed.

Thought Leadership

Classes/Seminars Taught

Panelist, Pennsylvania Bar Institute Continuing Legal Education program, Philadelphia's Compulsory Arbitration Program, 2001

Areas of Practice (5)

  • General Liability
  • Automobile Liability
  • Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation
  • Real Estate E&O Liability
  • Product Liability

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, B.S., Economics, 1982
Law School Attended:
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Law - Camden, Camden, New Jersey, J.D., 1992
Year of First Admission:
1992
Admission:
1992, Pennsylvania; 1993, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Memberships:

Associations & Memberships

•Montgomery County Bar Association, 2005 - Present
•Pennsylvania Bar Association, 1992 - Present

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Represented owner of deer fencing company sued by independent contractor whose assistant was injured when a tension cable being used in the installation of a deer fence system snapped and lacerated the plaintiff's face and eyes. Established that plaintiff himself was the cause of the cable snapping and subsequent injuries. Defense verdict.; Defense verdict in novel negligence/premises liability case. Defended a night club which had hired an off-duty state constable as a security guard who shot and killed a pedestrian who had just pulled a handgun and fired into a crowd of people on a busy city sidewalk. Two bystander plaintiffs alleged they were struck by bullets fired by the constable's weapon. Jury apparently agreed with our position that the decedent created a public hazard and that the constable's response was necessary and appropriate. We also argued that there was no proof that the bystanders were struck by bullets from the constable's weapon. We established that at least two other weapons were discharged during the situation and there were more bullets and bullet fragments present than could be accounted for by the known weapons. One bystander did not have the bullet removed from his body, and the bullet which struck the other bystander passed through her body and was not identified from those recovered at the scene.; Represented seller of home accused by plaintiff of failure to disclose numerous of prior incidents of water intrusion. Conceded a single incident of water intrusion, which occurred post execution of agreement of sale and which was thought to have been repaired. Asked the jury to find for the plaintiff in the amount of approximately $2,000 for repairs related to that incident. Jury returned verdict of $2,500 for plaintiff.; Represented plumbing contractor joined by home builder as an additional defendant in numerous construction defect cases commenced against builder by homeowners. Successfully raised The Gist Of The Action Doctrine as a complete bar to claims for contribution and indemnification by builders. Five claims dismissed on motions in Chester County Court of Common Pleas. Two more claims pending in Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.; Published Works: The (Rarely Heard) Other Voice In The Courtroom, Defense Digest, 2004; Limit Those Claims: Applying the 'Gist of the Action Doctrine' to Remove Negligence, Fraud, Common Law Contribution and Indemnification Claims, Defense Digest, 2008
ISLN:
900569942

Peer Reviews

4.5/5.0 (11 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® Distinguished Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.6/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.3/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.5/5.0
  • Communication

    4.3/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.5/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Timothy J. Hartigan

Contact Information:

610-354-8299  Fax

www.marshalldennehey.com

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.