Walter J. Klekotka

Walter J. Klekotka: Attorney with Marshall Dennehey
  • Shareholder at Marshall Dennehey
  • 15000 Midlantic Drive, Suite 200, P.O. Box 5429, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
    View Walter J. Klekotka's office location
  • Walter J. Klekotka Jr. is a shareholder with Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin and currently practices in the areas of premises liability, asbestos, hospitality/dram shop, products, auto, and pharmaceutical matters.
  • Overall Rating

    4.7
    .
    10 Reviews
  • Overall Rating

    4.7
    .
    10 Reviews
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #16 in weekly profile views out of 1,136 Attorneys in Mount Laurel, NJ
    • #18,319 in weekly profile views out of 2,343,578 total attorneys Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Walter currently practices in the areas of premises liability, asbestos, hospitality/dram shop, product, auto, trucking & transportation and pharmaceutical matters. He has extensive experience in premises liability in the retail sector, having handled several hundred cases ranging from slip and falls to falling merchandise claims. He likewise has broad experience in pharmaceutical matters, representing numerous pharmacies and pharmacists in misfill and mislabel matters. In the course of his career, Walter has taken more than 50 matters to trial, including many jury trials. He is also quite skilled in alternative dispute resolution forums such as mediations and arbitrations.

Walter is a graduate of the University of Delaware where he obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics. He received his juris doctor from The Delaware Law School of Widener University, after which he joined Marshall Dennehey. In 1991, he moved to the New Jersey office where he concentrated his practice on general liability matters. He has been a shareholder since January of 1996.

Walter initially began his career in the asbestos department where he handled hundreds of asbestos personal injury actions involving various claims of lung disease. As such, early in his career, he took numerous cases to verdict.

Walter is frequently asked by clients and industry organizations to lecture on a variety of topics concerning premises liability, automobile law and general liability matters.

Honors & awards

AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell

The Martindale Hubbell rated attorney list is issued by Internet Brands, Inc. A description of the selection methodology can be found here . No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

The Best Lawyers in America, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
2025-2026

The Best Lawyers list is issued by Woodward & White. A description of the selection methodology can be found here . No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Year joined

1987

Results

Summary Judgment Secured in Slip-and-Fall Case

Premises & Retail Liability
November 7, 2025

We were granted summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case where the plaintiff claimed to have slipped and fell on snow/ice in a parking lot when getting into her car. Our client and one of the co-defendants had property lines next to each other. Based on the accident report, the plaintiff’s testimony and our expert report, we argued that the plaintiff did not fall on our property and, as a result, we owed her no duty. The judge agreed and dismissed all claims against our client.

Dismissal of All Claims Secured in a Personal Injury Action in New Jersey

Amusements, Sports & Recreation Liability
September 18, 2025

We secured dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, in a personal injury action on behalf of a nonprofit organization operating youth baseball leagues in New Jersey. The plaintiffs sought to hold our client liable under a negligence theory after their minor child was injured while participating in our client’s recreational baseball league. We moved for summary judgment, arguing that the league was a nonprofit organization entitled to protection under New Jersey’s Charitable Immunity Act, which shields nonprofits from ordinary negligence.

Jury Defense Verdict Secured in a Case Involving Negligent Propane Services

General Liability
Premises & Retail Liability
June 14, 2024

We obtained a jury defense verdict in Cumberland County, New Jersey. We defended a major propane company where it was claimed that they provided negligent service to a stove which allegedly caused a trailer fire. The plaintiffs lost everything in the fire, including their pets. They also sustained serious and permanent burn injuries. Total medical bills were in excess of $1.5 million, and there was a $227,000 Medicare lien. The plaintiffs’ demand was $5 million. In less than two hours, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense.

Confirmation for obtaining the grant of summary judgement in a premises liability case.

Premises & Retail Liability
Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice
August 13, 2021

Our defense team successfully obtained an affirmance of the grant of summary judgment in a premises liability case. The plaintiff asserted he tripped and fell in our client’s supermarket and that the fall exacerbated his epilepsy. The discovery period ended without the plaintiff producing an expert opinion that causally connected the medical complaints to the fall. The plaintiff claimed that his treatment for cancer caused his inability to be timely examined and to obtain an expert opinion.

Successful defense of grant of summary judgment in the New Jersey Appellate Division results in published opinion

General Liability
December 1, 2020

Walter Klekotka (Mount Laurel, NJ) and Walter Kawalec (Mount Laurel, NJ) were successful in defending a grant of summary judgment in the New Jersey Appellate Division that resulted in a published opinion. Our clients were the owner and manager of an apartment complex for seniors. The plaintiff/resident had returned from walking her dog and alleged she received injuries entering the elevator.

Thought Leadership

98 Marshall Dennehey Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

August 20, 2025
Marshall Dennehey is proud to highlight the firm’s 98 attorneys who have been recognized in the 2026 editions of The Best Lawyers in America and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America. Less than 6% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S.

On the Pulse... Premises and Retail Liability Group

Orlando
Mount Laurel
Premises & Retail Liability
June 1, 2021
Marshall Dennehey’s Premises and Retail Liability Practice Group, housed within the firm’s Casualty Department, defends Defense Digest, Vol.

Classes/Seminars Taught

Successful Strategies for Effective Mediation, Marshall Dennehey Client Seminar, July 20, 2022

Jurisdictional Trends & The COVID-19 Impact on FL NY NJ & PA, Marshall Dennehey Virtual Client Presentation, December, 2020

1997 Civil Motion Practice, New Jersey State Bar Association Civil Litigation for Paralegals, CISI Dram Shop, South Jersey Claims Association

Areas of Practice (7)

  • Premises and Retail Liability
  • Hospitality and Liquor Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Property Litigation
  • Asbestos and Mass Tort Litigation
  • Trucking & Transportation Liability
  • Catastrophic Claims Litigation

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Delaware, B.S., Economics, 1983
Law School Attended:
Widener University School of Law, Wilmington, Delaware, J.D., 1987
Year of First Admission:
1987
Admission:
1987, Pennsylvania; 1987, New Jersey
Memberships:

Associations & Memberships

Camden County Bar Association
Claims & Litigation Management Alliance (CLM)
New Jersey State Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Obtained summary judgment for their client, a large retail store, in a premises liability case.; Plaintiff brought suit against our client, a large retail store, alleging negligence for a physical altercation between a former employee and a customer. Plaintiff argued that the former employee held himself out as an employee, and the store was negligent in failing to protect the customer from criminal acts. We moved for Summary Judgment as the assailant was a former employee, and there was no foreseeability to put the store on notice for any criminal acts by a third party. At oral argument, we established that the record was clear as to the former employee's status at the time of the incident, and that the opposition arguments (the employee was stocking shelves and wearing clothing similar to the store uniform) were not genuine issues of material fact. The judge agreed and granted Summary Judgment for our client.; Successfully defended a grant of summary judgment in the New Jersey Appellate Division that resulted in a published opinion. Our clients were the owner and manager of an apartment complex for seniors. The plaintiff resident had returned from walking her dog and alleged she received injuries entering the elevator. She had allowed the dog to enter first, when the doors began to close. She alleged injuries occurring when the right door struck her arm, and when she used her left arm and left side of her body to slow the doors from closing while she leapt into the elevator.; She sued our clients and the company hired to maintain the elevator, but was unable to establish any proof of negligence. The trial judge dismissed the case, declining to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, in part, because the plaintiff could not establish the third element of the doctrine: that the injury did not result from the plaintiff's own voluntary act or neglect. On appeal, the plaintiff argued that the Appellate Division should eliminate this third element. The Appellate Division, in a published opinion, concluded that the third element is a well-established law in New Jersey and only the New Jersey Supreme Court could eliminate it, and that court has shown no inclination to do so. Because the plaintiff could not demonstrate the third prong, res ipsa was not applicable and the failure of the plaintiff to establish negligence resulted in summary judgment in the defendants' favor.; Obtained a defense verdict for a large supermarket chain involving an injury to a vendor from a swinging door.; Obtained a defense verdict for a large supermarket chain involving a fall down as a result of a foreign substance on the floor.; Obtained a defense verdict representing a Gas station Mini Market involving a slip and fall on foreign substance on the floor.; Obtained a defense verdict in a case involving allegations of RSD.; Successfully mediated products liability matter with loss of sight in one eye.; Successfully mediated products liability case involving permanent facial disfigurement.; Published Works: 'No More Pigeonholes in Premises Liability Law,' New Jersey Law Journal, August 21, 2006; 'New Jersey Charitable Immunity Act: Public University Exempt From Suit Even Though Judgment Would Be Paid From Public Funds,' Defense Digest, 2002-09, Vol. 8, No. 3; 'The Downsizing of the Collateral Source Rule,' Defense Digest, 2001-12, Vol. 7, No. 6, co-author; 'Then N.J. Appellate Division Clarifies Duty Owed by Commercial Tenant,' Defense Digest, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1997; 'The Blizzard's Backlash: A Symposium on Issues Confronting Pennsylvania and New Jersey Property Owners,' (Co author), Defense Digest, March 1996; 'New Jersey Spoliation of Evidence and the Doctrine of Res Ispa Loquitur,' Defense Digest, August 1995; 'New Jersey Creates Recreational Sports & Leisure Activities Liability Study Commission,' Defense Digest, Summer 1994
ISLN:
905831907

Peer Reviews

4.7/5.0 (10 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.7/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.6/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.7/5.0
  • Communication

    4.6/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.7/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 03/02/13 in Civil Litigation

    Terrific, highly ethical and hard-workning lawyer. A credit to our profession.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Judge on 02/22/13 in Civil Litigation

    Walter is an excellent civil litigator. He knows how to properly evaluate a case-settles when appropriate and holds firm when appropriate. If the case has to be tried, he is always well-prepared and tries an excellent case.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Sole Practitioner on 03/25/13 in Torts

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Senior Associate on 03/12/13 in Insurance Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Other Law Firm Position on 02/22/13 in Defense Litigation

    He is one of the top insurance defense attorneys I know. He is a strong advocate for his clients.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 07/25/11 in Civil Liability

  • 4.6/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 03/25/13 in General Practice

    Very capable attorney

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 03/24/13 in General Practice

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Principal on 02/22/13 in Insurance Litigation

  • 4.0/5.0 Rated by a Partner on 04/25/12 in Personal Injury Defense

Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Walter J. Klekotka

Contact Information:

856-414-6077  Fax

www.marshalldennehey.com

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.