Frilot L.L.C.

  • Established in 1995
  • Firm Size 45
  • Peer Reviews

    4.7/5.0 (88)
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #10 in weekly profile views out of 1,032 Law Firms in New Orleans, LA
    • #1,888 in weekly profile views out of 299,964 total law firms Overall
Attorney Awards

Commercial Litigation

The Commercial Litigation Group at Frilot L.L.C. handles a wide variety of cases arising from commercial and business disputes. The group represents plaintiffs and defendants before all state and federal courts and agencies at all stages of a case from filing to final appeal. Some of the firm’s most experienced lawyers practice in this area and have had winning results handling matters in Louisiana and across the nation, involving:

  • Complex Business Litigation,
  • Patent and Trademarks,
  • Lender Liability,
  • Unfair Trade Practices,
  • Class Actions,
  • Contract, Lease, and Construction Disputes.

The group also has considerable experience in loan workouts, collections, foreclosures, and bankruptcies for local and out-of-state lending institutions. The lawyers regularly represent several commercial entities and asset-based lenders, and often work closely with other practice groups in the firm to represent maritime interests, manufacturers, health care providers, real estate developers, oil and gas concerns, and agribusinesses.

In the field of corporate collection and creditors’ rights, the group represents lenders and creditors in collection actions, post-judgment efforts, and bankruptcy cases, and has handled numerous foreclosures, garnishments, sequestrations, attachments, and seizures. Notably, Eddie Rantz represented the seizing creditor in the U.S. Marshal’s sale of the $4.6 million St. Tammany Plaza in Covington, Louisiana.

In other areas of commercial litigation, Joe Mole acquired and collected, after a two-month jury trial, one of the largest judgments ever awarded in an antitrust case in New Orleans. Additionally, Joe Mole obtained a landmark federal appellate decision holding that damages for intentional patent infringement are non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. Earlier, Joe Mole obtained a zero jury verdict for Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. in a ten-week jury trial in which the plaintiffs sought over $750 million in damages.

Representative Cases

Axcess Global Communications v. Matsushita (Panasonic)
Joseph Mole led the defense of Matsushita Electrical Industrial Company, Ltd., in a major commercial case in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. After nine weeks of testimony and a request for $754 million in damages, the jury rejected the plaintiff’s claim that Matsushita had victimized it by stealing its pager technology. The zero jury verdict was returned in less than 45 minutes.

Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc.(Tenet Healthcare Corp.) v. LEI
Joseph Mole and Mike Phillips obtained a victory on behalf of Tenet Healthcare Systems in a longstanding contract dispute between Tenets subsidiary, Lifemark Hospitals, Inc., and Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. A judgment was obtained allowing Tenet to cancel a contract costing it millions of dollars per year in excess charges and remove the opposing party from conducting business at the hospital.

Coastal Plains v. Browning Mfg. (Emerson Electric Co.)
Representing Emerson Electric, the firm obtained reversal of the bankruptcy and trial courts refusal to dismiss plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract. The Fifth Circuit reversed the jury award in favor of plaintiff and rendered a decision in favor of Emerson. This is now considered the seminal case for the application of estoppel and res judicata in the Fifth Circuit.

State ex rel. Ieyoub v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. (Murphy Oil)
The Commercial Practice Group represented Murphy Oil USA, Inc., in this case along with a group of other cases filed by the Louisiana Attorney General and independent gasoline distributors in connection with the retail sale of gasoline. The cases were based upon Louisiana’s predatory pricing statute, which sets strict guidelines for minimum pricing of products sold in Louisiana. Although the cases were filed in hostile venues, the firm’s lawyers achieved complete exoneration for Murphy’s pricing practices.

Zapata Gulf Marine Corp. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority
The firm represented Zapata Gulf Marine Corporation. (now a part of Tidewater) in this case involving a containerized cargo between the United States and Puerto Rico. They were able to recover $45 million following a ten-week antitrust trial and a jury verdict for their client.

People (45)

0 Applied Filters

Refine Results

Admiralty & Maritime, Insurance Defense, Transportation and Trucking

Peer Reviews
No Reviews

Mass Tort & Class Actions, Medical Malpractice & Healthcare

Peer Reviews
4.7/5.0 (20) Reviews

Admiralty & Maritime, Energy & Environmental, Mass Tort & Class Actions, Products Liability

Peer Reviews
5.0/5.0

Medical Malpractice & Healthcare

Peer Reviews
No Reviews

Medical Malpractice & Healthcare, Professional Liability

Peer Reviews
4.6/5.0 (28) Reviews

Labor & Employment, Products Liability

Peer Reviews
5.0/5.0 (1) Review

Insurance Coverage, Professional Liability

Peer Reviews
4.9/5.0 (4) Reviews

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Admiralty & Maritime, Insurance Coverage, Transportation & Trucking

Peer Reviews
5.0/5.0 (1) Review

Admiralty & Maritime, Construction Law, Insurance Coverage & Defense, Mass Tort & Class Actions

Peer Reviews
4.7/5.0 (2) Reviews

Admiralty & Maritime, Mass Tort & Class Actions, Energy & Environmental, Construction Law, Insurance Coverage & Defense

Peer Reviews
4.3/5.0 (3) Reviews

Peer Reviews

4.7/5.0 (88 reviews)
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.7/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.7/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.7/5.0
  • Communication

    4.7/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.7/5.0

*Attorneys who only have peer reviews prior to April 15, 2008 are not displayed.

Documents (5)

Documents by this Organization on Martindale.com

Diversity

Commitment to Diversity

Frilot L.L.C. is committed to fostering a working environment that promotes diversity. The firm believes that diversity of experience, diversity in clients and diversity in the courtroom makes us a more powerful legal resource.  We recruit, retain and advance qualified individuals of all backgrounds and cultural influences. This diversity makes for a richer environment which promotes creative thinking and innovative client solutions.

While we are encouraged by what we have accomplished in our pursuit of diversity, the firm strives to strengthen and advance our commitment to attract and retain women and minorities.  Recognizing that recruitment is only one facet of our overall commitment to diversity, we are also focused in our efforts to develop and sustain a work environment that empowers all people, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation or background, to perform to the best of their abilities.

 

  1. Matter Budgeting and Financial Management

    • Does the firm establish formal budgets for client engagements? Yes
    • Are bills submitted electronically? Yes
  2. Quality Management

    • Does the firm conduct end of matter reviews? Yes
  3. Litigation General Best Practices

    • Does the firm have a formalized new associate litigation training/mentoring program? Yes
    • Does the firm's litigation department have a structured approach to early case assessment? For example: Does your firm implement a standard approach to determine risks and strengths early in a case to assess trial or settlement options? Yes
    • Does the firm have an established records management team to assist clients with records retention, compliance and litigation preparedness? Yes
  4. Litigation eDiscovery Best Practices

    • Does the firm have an established eDiscovery Committee? No
    • Does your firm have any educational programs designed to address the changing federal rules of civil procedure? No
    • Does the firm have a standardized litigation hold program in place for its clients? No
    • Does your firm have a standardized protocol to guide client data collection? (i.e. Maintaining chain of custody, utilizing forensically sound procedures) No
    • Does the firm have a standardized protocol to guide processing clients' edata? (i.e. all data produced in PDF, meta data preserved?) Yes
    • Does the firm have a standardized approach for document reviews across practice groups (i.e. established protocol for eDiscovery review depending on the needs of the case) Yes
  5. Vendor Management

    • Does the firm have preferred vendor relationships? Yes
  6. Knowledge Management

    • Does the firm have a knowledge management program? Yes
  7. Disaster Recovery

    • Does the firm have a disaster recovery plan in place? Yes

Locations (1)

Contact Frilot L.L.C.

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.