Halloran & Sage LLP

  • Established in 1935
  • Firm Size 90
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #20 in weekly profile views out of 450 Law Firms in Hartford, CT
    • #802 in weekly profile views out of 314,629 total law firms Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Coverage Litigation

Insurance coverage litigation is a core practice at Halloran & Sage, where our coverage attorneys dedicate themselves exclusively to the prosecution and defense of these lawsuits. Our firm has achieved prominence for our representation of insurers in a variety of complex and cutting-edge coverage disputes.

Our record of success is broad. It includes coverage disputes arising out of CGL policies, professional liability policies, first-party property and casualty insurance, and life, health and disability insurance. Where appropriate, we employ an aggressive strategy, honed through years of experience, of using declaratory judgment actions to litigate coverage disputes quickly and efficiently. We are equally adept at resolving complicated coverage litigation through mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution.

We take particular pride in our ability to achieve optimal results for our clients while never losing sight of their bottom line. Through skill, experience and efficiency, we provide our clients with the highest level of legal representation in insurance coverage litigation.

Rep Matters

Aggressive Discovery Approach Leads to Withdrawal of Claims Against Insurance Company

Coverage Success before the Connecticut Supreme Court

National Grange Mutual Ins. Co. v. Santaniello

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Continental Casualty Company


Favorable Rulings in Federal Court

Insurer Successfully Defends Motion to Dismiss/Stay Declaratory Judgment Action

No Coverage for Assault in a Bar

No Coverage for ATV Use on Streets in Private Association

Acmat v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company


Sullivan v. Guzman
, 42 CLR 233 (Adams, J.)

Successfully Cancelling Policies for Nonpayment of Premium

Favorable Ruling in Umbrella Coverage Case

Insured’s Late Notice Resulted in Forfeiture of Coverage, Court Rules

No Coverage for Wrongful Death Under Unicover Umbrella Coverage Part

Insured's Failure to Cooperate Results in No Coverage

No Coverage for Nightclub Shooting

Connecticut Court Finds No Coverage for Eminent Domain Action

H & S Obtains Judgment in Insurance Coverage Action Involving Wrongful Death Claim

H & S Obtains Summary Judgment in Favor Of Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. on an Issue of First Impression in Connecticut

Insurance Coverage Claim Dismissed in Construction Case

Another Connecticut Court Holds That There Is No Coverage For A Shooting In A Nightclub

H & S Successfully Obtains Summary Judgment for Excess Insurer in Federal Lawsuit Stemming from a Fatal Electrical Explosion

Summary Judgment Victory in Insurance Coverage Matter

Central Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hobbs, 3:13-CV-00031-WWE, 2014 WL 6474335 (D.Conn. Nov. 19, 2014)

H & S Prevails in Insurance Coverage Case, Brown v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 150 Conn. 405 (2014), Presenting Issue of First Impression

Appellate Court Holds that Insurer Does Not Need to Prove Prejudice if Insured Fails to Submit Proof of Loss, Palkimas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 150 Conn. App. 655 (2014)

Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. El Rancho De Pancho LLC, 2013 WL 6326609 (D. Conn. 2013)

Juan v. Lancer, et al., No. LLI-CV-07-5002597-S, 2011 WL 4447269 (Conn. Super. Sept. 9, 2011).

Empire Fire Marine & Ins. v. Lang, et al., 655 F.Supp.2d 150 (D. Conn. 2009).

Vale Properties LLC v. All American Environmental Services LLC, No. 085004885S, 2010 WL 3342188 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 28, 2010) (Marano, J.).

H & S Obtains Summary Judgment in Commercial General Liability Matter, Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Leyman Watson, et al.

Halloran & Sage Successfully Defends Insurer in Negligent Failure to Settle Case

Insured's Failure to Cooperate Results in No Coverage, Selective Insurance Company v. Oliveira, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41660 (D.Conn. May 18, 2009)

Court Permits Insurer to Pursue Declaratory Judgment Action to Establish Right of its Insured to Additional Insured Status

H & S Obtains Favorable Summary Judgment Ruling in Umbrella Coverage Case, Winchester Industries, Inc., et al. v. Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company, et al., No. 3:06-CV-858 (AHN)

Latex Foam Intern. Holdings, Inc. v. Richard N. Goldman & Co., 2007 WL 447916 (Conn. Super. Ct. January 26, 2007)(Langenbach, J.)

Nichols v. Subway Restaurant, 98 Conn. App. 837, 912 A.2d 1037 (2006)

Deprey v. Continental Cas., 39 Conn. L. Rptr. 231, 2005 WL 1156841 (Conn. Super. Ct. April 22, 2005) (Berger, J.)

Blardo v. General Sec. Indemn. Co. of Arizona, 2004 WL 2361799 (Conn. Super. Ct. September 28, 2004)(Shapiro, J.)

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 243 Conn. 401, 703 A.2d 1132 (1997); 252 Conn. 774, 750 A.2d 1051 (2000)

Hertz Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co., 245 Conn. 374, 713 A.2d 820 (1998)

Amica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Franklin, 147 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 1998)

People (90)

0 Applied Filters
Refine Results
Attorney
No Reviews
Attorney
No Reviews

Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Professional Liability, Appeals View More

Attorney
No Reviews
No Reviews

Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Product Liability & Toxic Tort View More

Attorney
No Reviews
Not Shown

Estate Planning, Trust Law, Estates Law, Estate Administration, General Corporate Law, Family Business Succession, Taxation Law, Estate and Gift Taxation, Civil Rights, Communications & Media, Probate, Real Estate View More

Member
No Reviews

Corporate Law, Banking Law, Creditors Rights, Education Law, Commercial, Land Use & Zoning View More

Counsel
No Reviews

Corporate Business & Transactions, Residential Real Estate, Real Estate, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, Lawsuits / Disputes, Commercial View More

Peer Reviews

Client Reviews Write a Review

Diversity

Halloran & Sage is fully committed to enhancing ethnic and cultural diversity within our firm. Diversity encourages enriched thinking, varied perspectives and insightful solutions, all of which are critical components in providing superior service to our clients. Through our recruitment, retention and development, our goal is to build a firm that reflects the diverse community in which we live and work.

In order to achieve meaningful and lasting progress toward this goal, we have pledged the firm's full philosophical and financial support. To carry out this pledge, we have created a senior-level Diversity Committee, which is charged with the oversight of all diversity initiatives throughout our firm. Key facets of our diversity initiatives are:

  • Recruitment. We actively recruit summer associates, first-year associates and lateral attorneys from a variety of ethnic    and cultural backgrounds. We participate in several collaborative relationships and initiatives that further this goal.
  • Retention. We strive to create and maintain an environment that promotes ethnic and cultural diversity over the long term.
  • Development and advancement. Our attorneys are active in numerous organizations that support the professional    development and advancement of attorneys from diverse backgrounds.
  • Community. As one of Connecticut's largest law firms, we are committed to making a difference in our community. We    dedicate time, talent and financial resources to a range of programs and events that foster and celebrate our community's diversity.

Location