Lane Powell PC

  • Established in 1875
  • Firm Size 224
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #87 in weekly profile views out of 2,292 Law Firms in Seattle, WA
    • #4,474 in weekly profile views out of 314,629 total law firms Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Appellate

After a hard-fought trial, it is vital that representation at the next level be provided by experienced lawyers who know the battlefield. Consider: In 1950, there were 40 appellate filings per federal appellate judge; by 1990, there were 200; today, there are well over 300. The story is the same in state courts. These numbers underscore the importance of advocacy that stands out by its excellence. It is that characteristic that sets Lane Powell’s appellate lawyers apart. They specialize not only in appellate procedure, but in appellate persuasion.

The experience of the Firm’s appellate attorneys is reflected by their involvement in significant cases that have shaped the development of law in state and federal courts. The following recent cases illustrate the breadth of that experience:

  • Hunter v. Home Depot, 270 Fed.Appx. 654, 2008 WL 754777 (9th Cir. 2008) (employment discrimination)
  • Huntsinger v. UnumProvident, 268 Fed.Appx. 518, 2008 WL 510534 (9th Cir. 2008) (ERISA benefits)
  • Northwest Gas Ass’n v. Washington Utilities & Transp. Com’n, 141 Wn. App. 98, 168 P.3d 443 (2007) (Public Records Act)
  • Emmert v. Artisan, 497 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2007) (interstate transportation)
  • Resident Councils of Washington v. Leavitt, 500 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2007) (amicus curiae; nursing regulation challenge)
  • Dahlke v. Cascade Acoustics, Inc., 216 Or. App. 27, 171 P.3d 992 (2007) (successor liability)
  • Wah Chang v. PacifiCorp, 212 Or. App. 14, 157 P.3d 243 (2007) (electricity market manipulation)
  • Buck v. SeaRiver Maritime, 211 Or. App. 324, 154 P.3d 750 (2007) (Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act)
  • Brown v. Brown, 206 Or. App. 239, 136 P.3d 745 (2006) (trust litigation)
  • Skidmore v. Clark, 205 Or. App. 592, 135 P.3d 367 (2006) (roadway easement dispute)
  • Schreiner v. Hulbert, 2005 WL 1473946 (9th Cir. 2005) (judicial immunity/state actor)
  • Betz v. Ganos, 196 Or. App. 5, 100 P.3d 756 (2004) (will contest)
  • Hamoui v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2004) (immigration)
  • Kelly v. Fleetwood, 377 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2004) (Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act)
  • Magana v. Hyundai Motor America, 123 Wn. App. 306, 94 P.3d 987 (2004) (crashworthiness)
  • Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edwards, 538 U.S. 974, 123 S. Ct. 1781, 155 L. Ed.2d 662 (2003) (amicus curiae; judicial review of punitive damages)
  • Longwood Village Condo. Ass’n v. Aetna Casualty, 2003 WL 22766047 (Wash. App. 2003) (insurance coverage)
  • Lund v. San Joaquin Valley Railroad, 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412, 71 P.3d 770 (2003) (FELA)
  • Moore Excavating v. Consol. Supply Co., 186 Or. App. 324, 63 P.3d 592 (2003) (indemnity)
  • Multicare Health System v. Dep’t of Health, 118 Wn. App. 597, 77 P.3d 363 (2003) (hospital siting)
  • Burg v. Shannon & Wilson, 110 Wn. App. 798, 43 P.3d 526 (2002) (engineering malpractice)
  • City of Seattle v. Burlington Northern RR Co., 145 Wn.2d 661, 41 P.3d 1169 (2002) (preemption of local regulations)
  • Oki v. Wells Fargo Bank, 298 F.3d 768 (9th Cir. 2002) (RICO)
  • 1519-1525 Lakeview Blvd. Condominium Ass’n v. Apartment Sales Corp., 144 Wn.2d 570, 29 P.3d 1249 (2001) (architect malpractice)
  • Citizens for Natural Habitat v. City of Lakewood, 2001 WL 950827 (Wash. App. 2001) (land use)
  • Guijosa v. Wal Mart, 144 Wn.2d 907, 32 P.3d 250 (2001) (public accommodations)
  • Hadley v. Maxwell, 144 Wn.2d 306, 27 P.3d 600 (2001) (collateral estoppel)
  • Hill v. BCTI, 144 Wn.2d 172, 23 P.3d 440 (2001) (employment discrimination)
  • Rhoads v. Evergreen Utilities Contractors, Inc., 105 Wn. App. 419, 20 P.3d 460 (2001) (LMRA preemption)
  • Nike, Inc. v. Northwestern Pacific, 166 Or. App. 312, 999 P.2d 1197, on rehearing, 167 Or. App. 322, 1 P.3d 1060 (2000), rev. denied, 332 Or. 137 (2001) (coverage action by insured)

The members of the Appellate Practice Group are known for their skill and credibility in the courts in which they appear and that, in the end, can make all of the difference.

People (224)

0 Applied Filters
Refine Results
Attorney
No Reviews

Creditors Rights, Health Care Contracts, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Long Term Care, Medical Collections, Mediation, Appeals View More

Assoc. Gen. Coun.
No Reviews

Contracts & Agreements, Financial Markets and Services, Business, Clean Tech, Corporate Finance and Securities, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Bribery and International Anti-Corruption, International Business, Mergers and Acquisitions, Native American Affairs, New Markets Tax Credits, Public/Private Partnership, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and Climate Change View More

Attorney
No Reviews

Business Litigation, Employment Law

Attorney
No Reviews

Business, Commercial, Civil Litigation, Construction, Insurance, Litigation, Personal Injury, Real Property, Torts, Civil Rights, Contracts, Commercial, Defective and Dangerous Products, Employment & Labor, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility View More

Attorney
No Reviews

Trusts, Estate Planning, Tax, Trusts

Attorney
No Reviews

Business Law, Business/ Commercial, Civil Litigation, Collections, Contracts, Employment, Immigration & Naturalization, International, Lawsuits & Disputes, Employment View More

Attorney
No Reviews

Estate Planning, Trusts & Estates, Estate Planning/Probate/Wills, Tax, Real Estate, Trusts View More

Attorney
No Reviews

Estate Planning, Business, Trusts and Estates

Peer Reviews

Client Reviews Write a Review

Diversity

Lane Powell has more than 135 years of commitment to our communities. This commitment is reflected in Lane Powell's hiring and promotion of women and individuals from diverse backgrounds. The Firm has established an attorney Diversity Committee. The Committee is tasked with designing and implementing programs and strategies that promote an inclusive work environment and encourage the development and success of all employees.

 

MultiCultural Law Magazine Recognizes Lane Powell for Diversity

Lane Powell ranked as one of the country’s top 100 firms for diversity in a recent poll by MultiCultural Law magazine. The annual issue featuring the top ranking firms will be received by many Fortune 500 general counsels, all ABA-approved law schools, as well as a host of national minority and women’s legal organizations. The magazine highlights successful minority and women lawyers. Readers get straightforward interviews with some of the nation’s leading minorities in the legal community. Look for this issue of MultiCultural Law magazine in April 2005.

We are proud of our Firm’s commitment to diversity and our communities. This commitment is reflected in Lane Powell’s hiring and promotion of women and individuals from diverse backgrounds.

The Diversity Committee's mission statement is as follows:

 

  • Promote, focus and improve the Firm's efforts to recruit, retain and advance attorneys from diverse backgrounds;
  • Promote, both inside and outside the Firm, our commitment to diversity;
  • Provide training to Lane Powell attorneys and staff on issues related to our increasingly diverse community, both inside and outside the Firm;
  • Promote efforts to reach out to the larger legal community to increase diversity in the legal profession;
  • Coordinate firm and individual attorney membership in local and national organizations committed to diversity in the legal profession;
  • Ensure that Lane Powell is represented at local and national events and conferences that focus on and promote diversity in the legal profession; and
  • Serve as a resource for the attorneys within the Firm with regard to developing and implementing strategies and tactics to promote, focus and improve our efforts to recruit, retain and advance attorneys from diverse backgrounds, particularly with regard to mentoring and training attorneys from diverse backgrounds.

Diversity Program

To illustrate Lane Powell’s continuing commitment to diversity, our attorneys have volunteered to participate in a cutting-edge program on racism, race relations, and racial problems in the legal profession. The six-week program, conducted by the Understanding Racism Foundation, included large law firms and was geared toward creating an understanding of the problems faced by minorities in our society. The program’s goal is to awaken participants to the awareness that racial problems still exist in our society, both overtly and subtly. And many individuals are unaware and are influenced by prior generations’ prejudice. It is hoped that this increased awareness will result in a more comfortable work environment for minorities and lead to greater attraction and retention of minorities. This program is ongoing, and Lane Powell is proud to have been the first firm to host it. Our attorneys have also participated in the Pre-law Conference for High School Students of Color sponsored by the American Bar Association and the Washington State Bar Association’s Young Lawyers’ Division.

To incorporate diversity at all levels of staffing, we actively recruit candidates from diverse backgrounds; this supports our commitment to diversity while also creating a team of qualified professionals, a team which we are extremely proud to call Lane Powell.

 

  1. Matter Budgeting and Financial Management

    • Does the firm establish formal budgets for client engagements? Yes
    • Are bills submitted electronically? Yes
  2. Quality Management

    • Does the firm conduct end of matter reviews? Yes
  3. Litigation General Best Practices

    • Does the firm have a formalized new associate litigation training/mentoring program? Yes
    • Does the firm's litigation department have a structured approach to early case assessment? For example: Does your firm implement a standard approach to determine risks and strengths early in a case to assess trial or settlement options? Yes
    • Does the firm have an established records management team to assist clients with records retention, compliance and litigation preparedness? Yes
  4. Litigation eDiscovery Best Practices

    • Does the firm have an established eDiscovery Committee? Yes
    • Does your firm have any educational programs designed to address the changing federal rules of civil procedure? Yes
    • Does the firm have a standardized litigation hold program in place for its clients? Yes
    • Does your firm have a standardized protocol to guide client data collection? (i.e. Maintaining chain of custody, utilizing forensically sound procedures) Yes
    • Does the firm have a standardized protocol to guide processing clients' edata? (i.e. all data produced in PDF, meta data preserved?) Yes
    • Does the firm have a standardized approach for document reviews across practice groups (i.e. established protocol for eDiscovery review depending on the needs of the case) Yes
  5. Vendor Management

    • Does the firm have preferred vendor relationships? Yes
  6. Knowledge Management

    • Does the firm have a knowledge management program? Yes
  7. Disaster Recovery

    • Does the firm have a disaster recovery plan in place? Yes

Location

Contact Lane Powell PC

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.