Smith Currie Oles LLP

  • Established in 1965
  • Firm Size 71
  • Profile Visibility [ i ]
    • #180 in weekly profile views out of 3,498 Law Firms in Atlanta, GA
    • #4,474 in weekly profile views out of 314,629 total law firms Overall
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Litigation

On a construction project of any complexity, disputes are often the rule – not the exception. Avoidance or a quick resolution of disputes is often crucial to the economic success of the project. In this regard, one point must be stressed at the outset: The key to quick resolution of disputes is the use of systems designed to collect, preserve and organize information, including documents, throughout the project. Project documentation helps all parties avoid disputes and facilitates thorough presentation of claims, and effective alternative dispute resolution measures and litigation. Resolution of construction disputes including claim preparation, alternative dispute resolution procedures, arbitration and litigation is discussed in Chapter 21 of Common Sense Construction Law.

The issue in construction disputes that generally receives the most attention and focus is liability. Does a differing site condition exist? Who caused the delay and is it compensable? However, the issue of damages or costs flowing from the events that give rise to liability is no less important. Too often, the issue of calculating costs and proving damages is given a back seat with little precision or scrutiny applied until late in the dispute resolution process. That approach can result in an entirely misguided claim effort, missed opportunities for settlement and loss at trial or arbitration. An early and realistic analysis of damages can help determine whether a claim really exists and the best means of preparing and positioning the claim and the affirmative recovery sought. The lawyers of Smith Currie have the experience to prepare and document the case for liability and the damages caused by project events. Chapter 16 of Common Sense Construction Law discusses proving costs and damages.

Areas of Concentration

Claims Preparation
Arbitration
Defending Claims
Litigation
Mediation
Negotiation

People (71)

0 Applied Filters
Refine Results
Attorney
No Reviews
Attorney
No Reviews

Litigation, Construction Law

No Reviews

Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Construction Law, Government Contracts View More

Attorney
No Reviews
Attorney
No Reviews
Attorney
No Reviews
Partner
No Reviews

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Construction Law, Environmental Law, Government Contracts, Litigation, Business, Government Attorneys, Real Property Law View More

Partner
No Reviews

Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Government Contracts, Lien Protection and Avoidance, Business View More

Peer Reviews

4.9/5.0 (100 reviews)
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.9/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.9/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.8/5.0
  • Communication

    4.8/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Eugene Heady by a Partner on 08/01/13 in Construction Law

    I had a very complex construction law case against Mr. Heady's client. At all stages, I was extremely impressed with his skills, his knowledge of the substantive law, his ethics and his ability to come to resolution. I unqualifiedly endorse him as... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Eugene Heady by a Partner on 08/01/13 in Construction Litigation

    I have the highest regard for Mr. Heady. He represented a co-defendant in a complex construction case in which I represented another co-defendant. He was an important member of our defense team, whose involvement was critical in advancing the litiga... Read more

    Read more
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location