Christina A. Ginter

Open for Business
Christina A. Ginter: Attorney with Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.
Attorney Awards
  • Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Christina A. Ginter is a principal of Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. Her concentration is in appellate practice.

Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Ginter served as an attorney with another law office based in Detroit. Her extensive experience encompasses a broad range of substantive issues spanning both the federal and state appellate courts.

Professional Accomplishments

•AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell
•DBusiness Magazine 2021-2026 “Top Lawyers” in Appellate Law
•Michigan Super Lawyers 2012-2023
•Michigan Super Lawyers - Rising Stars 2009-2011

Speaking Engagements

•“Plenary Breakout Session” (Moderator); Michigan Appellate Bench Bar Conference; Plymouth, Michigan; 5/14-16/2025
•“Civil Breakout Session” (Moderator); Michigan Appellate Bench Bar Conference; Plymouth, Michigan; 5/11-13/2022
•“Shaping the Law Breakout Session” (Moderator); Michigan Appellate Bench Bar Conference; Plymouth, Michigan; 4/20-22/2016
•“Civil Breakout Session” (Moderator); Michigan Appellate Bench Bar Conference; Plymouth, Michigan; 4/24-26/2013

Publications

•“Update on Michigan Legislative Action Affecting Medical Malpractice Actions,” Health Care Review Weekly, 2013

See more ›

Areas of Practice (4)

  • Appellate
  • Appeals
  • Complex Litigation Support
  • Tort Reform

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Michigan, B.A., English Literature, 1993
Law School Attended:
University of Michigan School of Law, J.D., with honors, 1995
Year of First Admission:
1996
Admission:
Michigan Bar Admission; Supreme Court of the United States; United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Memberships:

Memberships

•State Bar of Michigan Appellate Practice Section
- Chair (2009-2010)
- Council Member (2006-2009)
- Publications Committee (2006-2009)

Birth Information:
Trenton, Michigan, February 8, 1971
Reported Cases:
Representative Matters: Victor v. ACH, ___ F.4th ___ (2026). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant health care corporation on negligence claims brought under section 1983, after a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff at trial. The Court held that witnesses' testimony that they cannot recall whether an event occurred is not sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to the occurrence of that event.; Duncan v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 854 Fed. Appx. 652 (2021). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a plaintiff has no standing to recover 'double damages' from automobile insurer under Medicare Secondary Payer Act, where the plaintiff cannot establish any concrete injury due to a claimed delay in Medicare reimbursement.; White v. Hutzel Women's Hospital, 498 Mich. 881 (2015). After the Court of Appeals reversed a judgment in excess of $800,000 for plaintiff in a medical malpractice action and remanded the case for a new trial, the Supreme Court, on further appeal by the hospital, granted the hospital's request for additional relief and issued an order directing entry of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in the hospital's favor.; Doe v. Henry Ford Health System, 306 Mich. App 592 (2014). In a case of first impression, a putative class action involving claims of electronic data breach, the Court of Appeals reversed the grant of class certification and held that summary disposition should have been granted, concluding that there was no viable action for invasion of privacy or negligence because there was no intentional conduct or present injury.; Meier v. Awaad, 299 Mich. App 655 (2013). In a case of first impression in a case involving a request for class certification, the Court of Appeals rejected the plaintiffs' attempt to obtain the names and addresses of nonparty patients of the defendant physician by sending a subpoena to a third party payor of the medical bills, the Michigan Department of Community Health. The Court reaffirmed the broad scope of the physician-patient privilege by holding that the privilege continues to apply even after privileged information has been disclosed to a third party that is not a health care provider.
ISLN:
910176642

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (13 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge

  • Legal Knowledge

    5.0/5.0

  • Analytical Capability

    5.0/5.0

  • Judgment

    5.0/5.0

  • Communication

    4.9/5.0

  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Christina A. Ginter

Contact Information:

888-811-7144  Fax

313-965-7403  Fax

https://www.dmclaw.com

Required Fields

Required Fields

Clear All Fields

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.