Derek W. Kaczmarek

Open for Business
Derek W. Kaczmarek: Attorney with Kaczmarek & Jojola PLLC
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Derek W. Kaczmarek stands as a cornerstone in the realm of tax law, serving as a partner and co-founder of Kaczmarek & Jojola, a distinguished tax litigation firm. With a practice rooted in tax litigation, tax audits, and tax collection, Mr. Kaczmarek is renowned for his adept representation of individuals, businesses, trusts, and estates facing scrutiny from the I.R.S. and state/local taxing authorities.

Having earned esteemed recognition within his field, Mr. Kaczmarek was elected Chair of the Tax Section of the State Bar of Arizona in 2018, reflecting the trust and respect he commands among his peers. His legal skills are further underscored by his certification as a tax law specialist by the State Bar of Arizona's Board of Legal Specialization, a distinction that speaks volumes about his depth of knowledge and commitment to excellence.

Mr. Kaczmarek's journey into tax controversy began as a trial attorney with the I.R.S. in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 2005, culminating in his role as a senior trial attorney with the I.R.S. in Phoenix, Arizona, in 2012. During his tenure, he amassed a wealth of experience, representing the I.R.S. in numerous high-stakes cases before the United States Tax Court. His track record boasts more than forty U.S. Tax Court trials, wherein he served as lead counsel, and his advisory role extended to guiding I.R.S. revenue agents and officers on matters ranging from criminal cases to international tax issues.

Mr. Kaczmarek's approach to advocacy is marked by discretion and aggression, a testament to his ability to leverage his background as a former government attorney alongside his nuanced understanding of I.R.S. and U.S. Tax Court practices and procedures.

In addition to his professional achievements, Mr. Kaczmarek has garnered acclaim through a series of prestigious accolades, including recognition as a Super Lawyer in Tax Law and inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America. His commitment to excellence is further underscored by his Martindale-Hubbell AV Peer Rating and his receipt of awards from the I.R.S. Office of Chief Counsel for litigation of national significance.

Mr. Kaczmarek's leadership extends beyond the courtroom, as evidenced by his active involvement in various bar associations and professional organizations. He has held esteemed positions within the State Bar of Arizona's Tax Section and the Western States Bar Association, demonstrating his dedication to advancing the field of tax law and serving the legal community with distinction.

Areas of Practice (9)

  • Employment Tax
  • Tax Collections
  • I.R.S. Audit
  • Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
  • Innocent Spouse Relief
  • Tax Litigation
  • Captive Insurance
  • Monetized Installment Sale Transactions
  • Yacht Chartering

Education & Credentials

Law School Attended:
Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington, J.D., cum laude, 2003; New York University School of Law, LL.M., Taxation, 2005
Year of First Admission:
2003
Admission:
2003, Indiana; 2004, Illinois; 2011, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2011, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit; 2012, Nevada; 2003, U.S. Tax Court and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana; 2011, Arizona
Birth Information:
Chicago, Illinois, December 4, 1974
Reported Cases:
Published Cases: Caylor Land & Development, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2021-30; Vickrey v. U.S., 484 F.Supp. 3d 884 (S.D. CA, 2020); Purvis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2020-13; Estate of Moore v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020-40; Babu v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020-121; Bruner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2018-10; Slone v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2016-115; Jones v. Commissioner, 146 T.C. 39 (2016); Kline v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-144; Estate of Giovacchini v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-27; Evenchik v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-34; Geyer v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-90; Bell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-152; Ellington v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-193; Dominguez v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-281; Fairlamb v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2010-22; Ernle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2010-237; Abdi v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2010-175; Crum v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-216; Rainbow Tax Service v. Commissioner, 128 T.C. 42 (2007); Fain v. Commissioner, 129 T.C. 89 (2007); Pimpleton v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-17; Kaldi v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-45; Ayala v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-59; Ayala v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-60; Steinberg v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-217
Certifications:
Certified Specialist in Tax Law Arizona Board of Legal Specialization
ISLN:
917485259

Peer Reviews

4.9/5.0 (11 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    4.8/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    4.8/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    4.9/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.9/5.0
Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
5.0/5.0 (10 reviews)
Lawyers Client Review
5.0/5.0 (2 reviews)
 Client Champion

Derek is one of the best lawyers I have ever had the pleasure to work with. My bank account was being levied and I had a tax debt going going back to 1999 and 2000 in excess of 170K and was in despera...

See more

Avvo Peer Endorsements

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Derek W. Kaczmarek

Contact Information:

Required Fields

Required Fields


By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.