Mr. Matthew J. Wildner

no photo
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Matthew is an attorney in the Professional Liability Department, where he represents businesses, directors and officers, design professionals, contractors and homeowners associations in commercial, professional liability, construct defect, architectural, engineering, and employment disputes.

Litigating in both state and federal court, Matthew devotes a significant portion of his practice to defending design professionals and construction professionals, independently as well as through their insurance carriers, in complex construction defect suits involving a variety of claims, such as building and design-related deficiencies, code violations, negligence, breach of contract and fraud, as well as insurance coverage claims under GL policies.

Additionally, Matthew represents employers in litigation and provides advice and counsel concerning a variety of employment-related matters, including claims alleging discrimination, wrongful discharge, breach of contract and related tort claims.

Matthew graduated from the University of Florida in 2006, where he received his B.A. He obtained his juris doctor in 2010 from Stetson University College of Law. Matthew is admitted to the Bar of the state of Florida. He is admitted to practice before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States District Court for the Southern, Middle and Northern Districts of Florida. Before moving into private practice, Matthew began his career at the Palm Beach County State Attorney's office, where he tried over 70 cases to verdict. Matthew also serves as an officer in the U.S. Army Reserve in the Judge Advocate General's Corps. He is a veteran of Operation Resolute Support, deploying to Afghanistan in 2016.

Media Commentary

•'How Serving as a JAG Reservist Sharpens This Marshall Dennehey Attorney's People Skills,' Daily Business Review, May 2, 2022

Thought Leadership

Legal Updates for Real Estate E&O Liability

What To Expect for Real Estate E&O In The Florida 2026 Legislative Session

February 5, 2026

Florida’s 2026 legislative session opens with an unusually heavy real estate agenda. If enacted, proposed measures could reshape transactional practices and expand compliance-driven errors-and-omissions exposure. More than 100 pre-filed bills address real property issues, with a primary focus on ad valorem tax reform, expanded disclosure and inspection regulation, and land-use and association governance changes. While full elimination of property taxes is unlikely, multiple proposals contemplate exemptions or phase-outs for homesteaded properties, seniors, disabled veterans, and first-time homebuyers.These changes directly affect property valuation, affordability analyses, and buyer-facing representations, which are all common sources of E&O claims when tax assumptions or investment projections later prove inaccurate. Several proposed bills also carry direct operational and insurance implications for real estate professionals:Transaction and Inspection Regulation:HB 65 - Requires home inspectors to meet DBPR standards and carry E&O insuranceSB 832 / HB 767 - Increased transparency in residential property insurance rate disclosuresZoning and Development:SB 48 / HB 313 - Mandatory local approval of accessory dwelling unitsSB 208 / HB 399 - Removal of zoning barriers to promote infill developmentHB 837 / SB 962 - Revised land-use definitions excluding farmlandAssociation and Property Governance:HB 465 / SB 822 - Licensing and contract requirements for community association management firmsSB 750 / HB 803 - Limits on municipal administrative fees for private inspections and plan reviewsSB 606 / SB 608 / SB 610 - Expanded residential pool-safety requirementsE&O Takeaway:The proposed 2026 legislation reflects a shift toward greater statutory regulation of real estate transactions, inspections, disclosures, and property governance. As regulatory requirements expand, liability risk increasingly arises from failure to recognize and implement new compliance obligations, miscommunication of zoning or tax impacts, and reliance on newly regulated third-party inspection services. Brokers, managers, and their E&O carriers should closely monitor enacted provisions and update transaction checklists, disclosure protocols, and client advisory practices accordingly.Legal Update for Real Estate E&O - February 2026, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We would be pleased to provide such legal assistance as you require on these and other subjects when called upon. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 Copyright 2026 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints or inquiries, or if you wish to be removed from this mailing list, contact [email protected].

Case Law Alerts

Florida increases minimum wage.

April 1, 2022

On September 30, 2022, the minimum wage will increase to $11.00 per hour. This comes after Florida’s minimum wage increased to $10.00 per hour on September 30, 2021 ($6.98 for tipped employees). The state minimum wage will continue to increase $1 per year thereafter until it reaches $15.00 per hour ($11.98 for tipped employees). After which, it will be adjusted annually based on inflation.Section 448.109, Florida Statutes, requires employers who pay their employees the Florida minimum wage to post a minimum wage notice in a visible and accessible place in each establishment where these employees work. In addition to the Florida minimum wage notice,federal law requires employers to post a notice of the federal minimum wage. Florida’s minimum wage notice is available for downloading in English, Spanish, and Creole from the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity’s website at: http://www.floridajobs.org. Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, April 2022 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright 2022 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.

News

Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 Shareholder Class and Special Counsel Promotions

December 15, 2025

Areas of Practice (6)

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Miscellaneous Professional Liability
  • Employment Law
  • Real Estate E&O Liability
  • Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation
  • Insurance Agents & Brokers Liability

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
University of Florida, B.A., 2006
Law School Attended:
Stetson University College of Law, J.D., 2010
Year of First Admission:
2010
Admission:
2010, Florida; U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida; U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida; U.S. District Court Northern District of Florida; U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
Memberships:

Associations & memberships

Florida Bar Association

Reported Cases:
Significant Representative Matters: Represented General Contractor facing class-action lawsuit with damages claimed to exceed $1 billion. Consulted and managed multiple expert teams to defend against allegations that construction vibrations caused by the client and its subcontractors contributed to the collapse of an adjacent condominium. Representation contributed to amicable early settlement that allowed the insurer to quickly move and spared the client ongoing reputational damage.; Represented General Contractor of high-rise condominium complex against the owner/developer who alleged a multitude of construction defects. Drafted a MSJ that reduced scope of claim by close to $1 million and contributed to successful counterclaim.; Represented subcontractor sued by Condominium HOA and General Contractor for subcontractor's limited scope of work in case containing over 20 parties. Negotiated quick and minor payouts as to all claims which resulted in carrier saving close to $100k in attorney's fees as opposed to protracted and costly litigation.; Obtained summary judgment in favor of a south Florida municipality. The lawsuit was filed against the municipality by a member of the police department, who alleged unlawful termination due to his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder diagnosis. The suit alleged a breach contract and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and the Family Medical Leave Act. The defense argued that the Plaintiff was not a qualified individual for the position of police officer because he could not perform the essential functions of his job with or without a reasonable accommodation, and that Plaintiff failed to state a claim on the Breach of Contract and title VII claims. The court agreed with the defense on both points and summary judgment was granted. This was a substantial victory for the municipality, the court ruling not only upheld the termination of an unqualified employee but also avoided a potential costly judgment against the Defendant.
ISLN:
922157562

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (13 reviews)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    5.0/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    5.0/5.0
  • Judgment

    4.9/5.0
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    5.0/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/11/24 in Commercial Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/11/24 in Litigation

    Matthew is an amazing attorney. He work ethic and professionalism is second to none.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/11/24 in Litigation

    Matthew is an excellent trial attorney. He is strategic and a consummate professional. He is always well received by any jury because of his phenomenal communication skills and glowing personality.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/07/24 in Construction Law

    I have known Matthew as an attorney for several years. He has a strong work ethic, is an exceptional attorney, and exhibits the highest ethical standards.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/06/24 in Litigation

    Matt has been my Judge Advocate Senior Defense Counsel for two years. In non-Army Reserve terms, he served as my supervisor as a senior public defender in the Army. He shows tremendous compassion for his clients and his team. Matt's amazing deme... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/06/24 in Insurance

    Matthew is extremely knowledgeable and works very hard to achieve complete client satisfaction. His attention to detail and work ethic are unmatched. He is an asset to any organization he is associated with and most importantly he is kind and compass... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 03/03/24 in Litigation

    Mr. Wildner is a seasoned trial attorney with a strong work ethic and the highest standard of professionalism. He is reliable and resourceful. He is experienced in multiple areas of law. He is well-respected within the legal community and the communi... Read more

    Read more
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 02/23/24 in Litigation

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Attorney on 02/23/24 in Construction Law

    An amazing litigator. He is well versed in the substantive and procedural law. Further, he deals with high-end litigation to include the Champlain Towers South collapse.

  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Counsel on 02/22/24 in Insurance

    Matt is an excellent legal advisor, providing sound and timely legal advice to insurance related clients.

Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Client Reviews Write a Review

Location

Contact Mr. Matthew J. Wildner

Contact Information

Preferred contact method
reCAPTCHA is required Invalid reCAPTCHA

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.