Mr. W. Mark Lanier

Offers Video Calls | Open for Business
Mr. W. Mark Lanier: Attorney with The Lanier Law Firm, P.C.
Attorney Awards
About Attorney Awards

Biography

Over more than 35 years, Mark has taken on some of the most difficult legal challenges and won some of the largest verdicts in U.S. history. His cases have confronted the harm caused by mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, dangerous drugs, defective medical devices, addictive social media, and other dangerous consumer products and services. His work has helped to protect the public and has led to changes in how companies conduct themselves. He’s also prevailed in significant and important business disputes involving fraud, breach of contract, and other commercial matters. Cumulatively, his trial work now exceeds $20 billion in verdicts.

What sets Mark apart is not only the size of the verdicts and settlements but also how he reaches them. He takes his clients’ story and makes a jury feel its weight, then uses that verdict to achieve appropriate justice. He prepares exhaustively and adopts new tools when they help, including artificial intelligence, yet he still tries every case the way he always has, by telling the truth plainly and trusting a jury to do what is right.

Mark is also widely regarded as one of the most persuasive courtroom advocates of his generation, known for distilling complex scientific and technical cases into clear, compelling narratives that resonate with juries. Speaking in plain language and without notes, he builds each case around a simple theme and reinforces it with vivid demonstratives, examples and props taken from everyday life, and carefully designed visual presentations that make difficult evidence easy for jurors to follow and understand. He shares this unique talent widely. Mark headlines his own Lanier Trial Academy each summer for more than 1,000 plaintiffs’ lawyers, and in 2025 he delivered the inaugural lecture in Case Western Reserve University School of Law’s Anatomy of a Trial series on trial strategy, persuasion, and storytelling.

Most recently, Mark led a trial team that secured a jury verdict totaling $6 million in compensatory and punitive damages for an individual plaintiff against Meta and Google’s YouTube in a landmark trial on the role of addictive social media platform features in harming mental health.

Mark has also become a prominent voice on the use of artificial intelligence in trial practice. In the social media addiction trial, he drew on a collaborative AI platform that integrates multiple large language models to help build and pressure-test his case strategy, an approach that drew wide attention in the legal and technology press. He also teaches the practical and ethical use of AI in litigation, from case development through trial, as part of the Lanier Trial Academy curriculum.

Mark’s success in the courtroom and perspectives on litigation have been featured in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, Bloomberg News, and the Houston Chronicle, among many other publications. He is also a frequent guest on news and business programs for a wide range of broadcast and cable networks, including CNBC, Fox News, CNN and Fox Business.

A devout Christian, Mark is also the founder of the Lanier Theological Library, one of the nation’s largest private theological collections. He teaches a weekly, 750-plus-member Sunday school class focusing on Biblical literacy at Champion Forest Baptist Church in Houston. He is a prolific author as well. His works examining faith include Christianity on Trial (IVP, 2014), Atheism on Trial (IVP, 2022), and Religions on Trial (IVP, 2023), along with a series of daily devotionals from Baylor University Press: Psalms for Living (2016), which received the 2018 Illumination Book Award in the Devotional category, Torah for Living (2018), Minor Prophets for Living (2024), and New Testament Letters for Living (2024). He has also authored the legal practice text Lanier’s Texas Personal Injury Forms.

Mark considers his greatest achievement to be his family. He is the father of five wonderful children and lives in Houston with his wife, Becky.

(Board Certified, Personal Injury Trial Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization) (Also Of Counsel to Michael B. Serling, P.C., Birmingham, Michigan)

Areas of Practice (16)

  • Products Liability
  • Pharmaceutical Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Complex Litigation
  • Asbestos Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Insurance Litigation
  • Civil Litigation
  • Toxic Torts
  • Appellate Practice
  • Airplane Crash Litigation
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Mesothelioma
  • Social Media Addiction Litigation

Education & Credentials

University Attended:
David Lipscomb College, B.A., 1981
Law School Attended:
Texas Tech University, J.D., 1984
Year of First Admission:
1985
Admission:
1985, Texas; 2005, New York; U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. District Court, Southern, Northern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; Illinois; 2007, Indiana; Arkansas; Colorado; Michigan; Oklahoma
Memberships:
Houston Bar Association; State Bar of Texas; Texas Trial Lawyers Association; Fox Business News; American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA); Christian Trial Lawyers Association (Founder).
Languages:
Spanish and English
Reported Cases:
2026 – A $6 million verdict against Meta and Google’s YouTube in the first social media addiction lawsuit trial in the nation, holding the platforms liable for addictive design features that harmed a young user’s mental health.

2024 – $8 million verdict from a jury that unanimously determined that exposure to asbestos from the BNSF Railyard in Libby, Montana was a contributing factor in the deaths of our clients who tragically succumbed to mesothelioma. This verdict represents the first successful community exposure case against BNSF Railway in relation to asbestos-related illnesses.

2021 – 2022 – Led the national trial team that secured a historic $650.6 million jury verdict against retail pharmacies operated by Walmart, CVS, and Walgreens. The jury affirmed that the pharmacies had failed to follow guidelines that would have curtailed the staggering distribution of highly addictive opioid painkillers. This was followed by another historic $1.85 billion settlement reached in Texas, with opioid manufacturers and distributors and was preceded by a $260 million settlement with opioid distributors AmeriSource Bergen Corp., Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corp., and Teva on behalf of two other Ohio counties on similar claims.

2018 – A record setting $4.69 billion verdict on behalf of 22 women and their families who alleged that decades of daily use of Johnson & Johnson’s asbestos-laden talcum powder products caused their ovarian cancer. This verdict was named National Law Journal’s Top Verdict of 2018. Johnson & Johnson took the verdict to the United States Supreme Court. On June 1st, 2021, the court rejected the J&J appeal in a brief written order, effectively ending the case and leaving in place a Missouri appeals-court ruling against the company.

2017 – $247 million verdict against DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and health care giant Johnson & Johnson.

2016 – $528 million verdict against DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and health care giant Johnson & Johnson, recognized by the National Law Journal as the Outstanding Medical Device Award for 2016, and as one of the Top 50 Verdicts of the Year.

2016 – $1.05 billion verdict against DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and health care giant Johnson & Johnson, the fourth largest verdict in America in 2016.

2014 – A class-action settlement on behalf of Missouri gun owners against Remington Arms Co. and its corporate parent, DuPont, over a trigger defect in Remington Model 700 rifles that could fire without the trigger being pulled.

2014 – $9 billion Actos verdict against Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Eli Lilly & Co.

2013 – A wide-ranging wrongful-death settlement for the family of a former University of Mississippi student-athlete against the university and the NCAA, after which the NCAA agreed to update its guidance for member schools on athletes with the sickle cell trait.

2010 – A $54.2 million verdict in San Antonio against Caterpillar Inc. and Holt Texas Ltd. after a jury found that defects and lax maintenance of construction equipment left a North Texas worker paralyzed at a job site.

2007 – A $6.5 million verdict for an oilfield worker who sustained life-altering injuries when struck by a falling pipe, after a jury found two West Texas drilling companies negligent.

2005 – $253 million in the first Vioxx® verdict in the U.S. (Ernst v. Merck).

2000 – Reversal of $1.6 billion judgment (Owens-Illinois v. T&N, Ltd., and Federal Mogul).

1998 – 115.6 million in an asbestos-related legal matter (Aaron v. Carborundum).

1993 – $417 million in a business fraud case against Amoco (Rubicon v. Amoco).
Certifications:
Board Certified, Personal Injury Trial Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization
ISLN:
905633976

Payment Information

Credit Cards Accepted
Other
Other Information
Free initial consultation, Fixed fees available

Peer Reviews

5.0/5.0 (1 review)
Martindale-Hubbell® AV Preeminent Rating Badge
  • Legal Knowledge

    5.0/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    5.0/5.0
  • Judgment

    5.0/5.0
  • Communication

    5.0/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    5.0/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 Rated by a Managing Partner on 02/03/12 in Litigation

    A real shining star! example of the best capabilities of a gentleman Texas trial lawyer.

Peer reviews submitted prior to 2008 are not displayed.

Other Legal Directories

Avvo Client Review
5.0/5.0 (1 review)
Lawyers Client Review
3.3/5.0 (1 review)
 Client Champion

I DIDN'T WIN THE CASE BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF STROKE MY MOM SUFFERED AT DEATH BUT THEY WORKED REALLY HARD FOR HER ESTATE IN THE VIOXX CASE. I LOST A FEW HUNDRED DOLLARS, BUT IT WAS WORTH IT.

See more

Avvo Peer Endorsements

Client Reviews Write a Review

Video

Location

Video Call Options

  • Zoom

Contact Mr. W. Mark Lanier

Contact Information

Preferred contact method
reCAPTCHA is required Invalid reCAPTCHA

By clicking on the "Submit" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Martindale and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.