-
3.4/5.0 Review for Trey Watkins by a Managing Partner on 04/04/12 in Civil Litigation
-
3.2/5.0 Review for Daniel Mulholland by a Partner on 04/12/12 in Litigation
Intemperate. Arrogant. Abusive to other lawyers. Overworks cases.
-
3.2/5.0 Review for Timothy Gray by a Unknown on 07/15/08 in Asbestos Litigation
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Daniel Mulholland by a Partner on 03/16/14 in Civil Litigation
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Mr. James Banks IV by a Sole Practitioner on 10/27/11 in General Practice
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Mr. James Banks IV by a Associate on 09/07/11 in Litigation
-
2.4/5.0 Review for Brian Hannula by a Member on 09/04/13 in Civil Litigation
-
1.8/5.0 Review for Michael Abraham by a Managing Partner on 03/11/10 in Asbestos Defense
-
1.2/5.0 Review for Daniel Mulholland by a Managing Partner on 03/24/14 in Toxic Substance Liability
-
1.2/5.0 Review for Daniel Mulholland by a Judge on 03/17/14 in Business Law
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Forman Watkins & Krutz LLP got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.