-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Glenn Adams by a Partner on 04/16/12 in Tax Law
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Glenn Adams by a Partner on 04/16/12 in Business Litigation
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Stephen Ball by a Partner on 04/16/12 in Employment Law
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Thomas McAleavey by a Partner on 04/16/12 in Corporate Commercial Law
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Caroline Tanner by a Partner on 04/09/12 in Litigation
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Caroline Tanner by a Partner on 03/22/12 in Litigation
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Shane Hart by a Partner on 03/19/12 in Estate Planning
-
5.0/5.0 Review for William Henderson by a Of Counsel on 03/13/12 in Environmental Land Use
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Tracy Nichols by a Partner on 03/12/12 in Litigation
-
5.0/5.0 Review for Mr. David May Jr. by a Partner on 03/12/12 in Administrative Law
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Scientific Games got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.