-
4.4/5.0 Review for Laura Renstrom by a Partner on 09/16/20 in Civil Litigation
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Mr. Benjamin Robinson by a Associate on 04/13/17 in Commercial Litigation
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Mr. Peter Hargitai by a Managing Partner on 02/09/17 in Litigation
Peter is a fine lawyer and with a bit more seasoning will become pre-eminent.
-
4.4/5.0 Review for James Davis III by a Partner on 12/21/15 in Government Affairs
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Mr. James Ramsey by a Managing Partner on 12/11/15 in Litigation
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Thomas Brooke by a Staff Lawyer on 06/11/14 in Intellectual Property Rights
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Christina Schwing by a Other Legal Professional on 04/01/13 in Commercial Litigation
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Robert Riva Jr. by a Government Counsel on 02/19/13 in Criminal Law
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Robert Riva Jr. by a Associate/Assistant General Counsel on 01/22/13 in Real Estate
Rob is very detail oriented and a great writer.
-
4.4/5.0 Review for Robert Riva Jr. by a Associate on 01/20/13 in Real Estate
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Scientific Games got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
