-
4.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Robert Highsmith Jr. by a Partner on 11/20/11 in Litigation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Robert Highsmith Jr. by a Partner on 11/03/11 in Local Government Relations
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Stephen Ball by a Partner on 05/22/11 in Commercial Litigation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Scott Newman by a Principal on 05/13/11 in Litigation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Christina Schwing by a Member on 10/28/10 in Litigation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Philip Rothschild by a Partner on 05/25/10 in Litigation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Crystal Adkins by a Partner on 05/17/10 in Tax Exempt Organizations
-
4.0/5.0 Review for James Davis III by a Sole Practitioner on 05/16/10 in Mediation
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Mia McKown by a Associate on 05/16/10 in Civil Liability
-
4.0/5.0 Review for Marisa Marinelli by a Of Counsel on 05/14/10 in Admiralty Law
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Scientific Games got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
