-
3.6/5.0 Review for Ms. Jennifer Mansfield by a Partner on 12/11/14 in Civil Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Steven Eric Jedlinski by a Partner on 07/01/14 in Patent Litigation
Steve is a terrific young lawyer. He is dedicated to his craft and learning every day.
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Steven Eric Jedlinski by a Associate on 07/01/14 in Intellectual Property
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Mr. Matthew Singer by a Senior Associate on 04/18/14 in Municipal Defense
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Christina Schwing by a Member on 04/01/13 in Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Mr. Jonathan Marcus by a Managing Partner on 02/13/13 in Complex Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Robert Riva Jr. by a Senior Associate on 03/01/12 in Business Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Mr. Scott Newman by a Principal on 05/23/11 in Commercial Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Eduardo Ramos by a Managing Partner on 05/04/10 in Commercial Litigation
-
3.6/5.0 Review for Michael Hantman by a Managing Partner on 04/19/10 in Federal Civil Litigation
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Scientific Games got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
