-
3.2/5.0 Review for Michael Frevola by a Partner on 05/12/10 in Admiralty Law
-
3.2/5.0 Review for Robert Labate by a Private Practice Lawyer on 04/25/10 in Bankruptcy
-
3.2/5.0 Review for Mitchell Herr by a Associate/Assistant General Counsel on 10/16/09 in Federal Civil Litigation
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Ms. Janna Lhota by a Partner on 01/12/16 in Land Use
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Monte Starr by a Partner on 09/20/12 in Construction Defects
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Christina Schwing by a Judge on 07/26/12 in General Practice
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Mr. Kevin Callahan by a Managing Partner on 02/12/12 in Litigation
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Anna Gamez by a Managing Partner on 11/02/11 in Trial Practice
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Christina Schwing by a Judge on 10/26/10 in Administrative Law
-
3.0/5.0 Review for Michael Eisenberg by a Associate on 05/08/10 in Patent Litigation
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Scientific Games got this award in 2026
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
