Walnut Creek, CA Qui Tam Litigation Attorneys

2 Applied Filters

PLEASE NOTE:

We were unable to find any law firm or attorneys that match your search. We have expanded the results to 20 miles from the original location.

Start Comparing

Compare

Walnut Creek, CA Qui Tam Litigation Attorneys

PLEASE NOTE:

We were unable to find any law firm or attorneys that match your search. We have expanded the results to 20 miles from the original location.

Attorneys (41)

    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Allan J. Graf
  • Of Counsel at Carlsmith Ball LLP
  • Los Angeles, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • David W. Ginn
  • Owner at Ginn & Crosby, LLP
  • Walnut Creek, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (18)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.8/5.0 (18)
    •  
  • Randy Sullivan
  • Partner at Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP
  • Pleasanton, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      4.0/5.0 (1)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.0/5.0 (1)
    •  
  • Matthew D. Davis
  • Shareholder at Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      4.0/5.0 (1)
    •  
  • Mark Emerson Reagan
  • Partner at Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, P.C.
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • John J. Powers
  • Partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Susan Tran
  • Associate at Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth A Professional Corporation
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Stephen R. Jaffe
  • Attorney at The Jaffe Law Firm
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating. Gold Client Champion Gold Client Champion  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating. Gold Client Champion Gold Client Champion  
  • Larry P. Zoglin
  • Of Counsel at Phillips & Cohen LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (22)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Alison Margaret Tucher
  • Partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Harry P. Litman
  • Of Counsel at Phillips & Cohen LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (1)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Jeffrey Robert Chanin
  • Partner at Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (0)
    • Awards
      A Martindale-Hubbell Peer rating reflects a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability Numerical rating.  
  • Dylan Hughes
  • Partner at Girard Gibbs LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Philip T. Besirof
  • Partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Judith Ann Waltz
  • Partner at Foley & Lardner LLP
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
  • Richard Martin Rogers
  • Member at Law Office of Richard M. Rogers
  • San Francisco, CA U.S.A.
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      None
    •  
    • Peer Reviews

      5.0/5.0 (3)
    •  

Qui Tam Litigation in Walnut Creek, CA

In certain instances when a private citizen (such as a whistleblower) assists the government in prosecuting criminal wrongdoing, the individual may be entitled to a share of any penalties that the wrongdoer pays in punishment. This concept is known as "qui tam" and in the United States is commonly used in connection with the False Claims Act (also known as the "Lincoln law"), which allows individuals to file claims against federal contractors that are allegedly breaking the law. If you know that the government is being defrauded, talk to qui tam attorneys immediately. Only the first person to take action is entitled to compensation, so time is of the essence. Qui tam lawyers can work with you to collect the necessary evidence and file a claim. If successful, you may be entitled to between 15 and 30 percent of any money that's recovered.